Skip to main content

Security report for mighty-shake.com

Mighty Shake · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mighty Shake is a well-established dance group and educational organization based in the Czech Republic, with a history dating back to 1995. The organization focuses on street dance and offers training and choreography services to a broad age range, from children to adults. Their market position is that of a respected local community group with a strong cultural presence and partnerships with local authorities and sports agencies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a variety of plugins and external libraries, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance documentation, which are areas for improvement. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but could be enhanced with additional headers and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear genuine. Overall, the website is functional and informative but requires improvements in privacy, security, and domain transparency to increase trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mighty-shake.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a non-profit dance group with a focus on education and community engagement. Their revenue model likely includes membership fees, local government support, and partnerships. The target audience includes children, youth, and adults interested in dance. The organization has a strong local presence with multiple training locations and a history of competitive success. Partnerships with national sports agencies and local municipalities strengthen their ecosystem. The website reflects a community-focused approach rather than commercial ambitions. Growth indicators include expansion into multiple towns and the establishment of a dedicated studio. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance digital presence and compliance to support future growth.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which could mitigate common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the WordPress version and plugins appear outdated, which may pose risks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is weak, with no privacy or cookie policies detected, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear security incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mighty Shake Zastávka z.s.
Registration number
26677156
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mighty Shake
Description
Mighty Shake is a dance group established in 1995, focused on street dance and dance education for youth and adults. They provide dance training, choreography, and artistic dance projects, with a history of participation in competitions and cultural events.
Key services
Dance training, Choreography, Dance education for youth and adults, Dance performances and projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.3.20, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Web Fonts, Contact Form 7 plugin, Frenify plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the dance group Mighty Shake.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No explicit security policies or incident response information present.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  5. Website uses WordPress with multiple plugins and external resources.
  6. Social media presence is established with official Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram links.
  7. No advertising or tracking services detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Contact information includes physical addresses and contact forms but no explicit emails or phone numbers found in the HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.3.20 with multiple plugins including Contact Form 7 and Frenify plugin. It uses jQuery 1.12.4 and loads Google Fonts asynchronously. The site includes various JavaScript libraries for UI effects and galleries. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization. The site lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance features. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. The technical stack is typical for a small community website but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mighty-shake.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mighty-shake.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.