Skip to main content

Security report for miele.lt

Miele · Manufacturing · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Miele.lt is the Lithuanian website for Miele, a globally recognized premium manufacturer of household and industrial appliances. The website showcases product offerings, promotions, and brand history, targeting general consumers interested in high-quality appliances. The site is built on a modern technology stack including OpenText Hybris and uses advanced web components and analytics tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not clearly presented. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the professional presentation and brand consistency suggest a legitimate enterprise presence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of miele.lt. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching miele.lt

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention miele.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
27
Employees
0
Customers
27
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
19%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for miele.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Miele operates as a premium appliance manufacturer with a strong global brand reputation. The Lithuanian site serves as a regional portal for product information, sales, and customer account management. The business model focuses on direct consumer engagement through e-commerce and promotional campaigns. The site reflects a mature digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools. However, the lack of visible contact and compliance information may impact customer trust and regulatory adherence. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and targets a broad consumer base seeking quality appliances.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No security or incident response policies are publicly available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The absence of contact information for security incidents is a gap in incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate commitment to security and compliance.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Miele
Description
Atraskite visame pasaulyje garsų “Premium” kokybės buitinių ir pramoninių prietaisų gamintojo prekių ženklą, kurio pavadinimas reiškia aukščiausią kokybę.
Key services
Manufacture and sale of household appliances, Industrial appliances, Product offers and promotions, Customer account management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Web Components, Google Tag Manager, Select2, Swiper.js, OpenText Hybris platform
Frameworks
OpenText Hybris, Custom domestic-core-frontend
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Use of secure cookies and consent mechanisms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and fully accessible.
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain, which is unusual for a commercial site.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and modular technology stack leveraging OpenText Hybris, custom web components, and popular JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and Select2. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with miele.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review miele.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.