Skip to main content

Security report for microsoft365.com

Microsoft Corporation · Technology · United States

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

89/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Microsoft 365 is a flagship cloud productivity platform offered by Microsoft Corporation, a global technology leader. The website provides access to Microsoft 365 Copilot and online versions of Office applications, targeting both individual and enterprise users. The platform is positioned as a market leader in productivity and collaboration software, leveraging Microsoft's extensive cloud infrastructure and ecosystem. The site demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with modern technologies, responsive design, and comprehensive privacy and security measures. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain www.microsoft365.com raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the content and branding strongly align with Microsoft. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and trustworthy, but domain registration verification is recommended for full assurance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of microsoft365.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching microsoft365.com

This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
89

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention microsoft365.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,543
Employees
0
Customers
3,510
Third parties
33
Weak passwords
18%

13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for microsoft365.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Microsoft 365 operates on a subscription-based business model offering cloud-based productivity tools and collaboration services. Its competitive advantage lies in integration with the broader Microsoft ecosystem, including Azure cloud services and Microsoft Graph APIs. The target customers range from individual consumers to large enterprises. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem and invests heavily in security certifications and compliance. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation such as Microsoft 365 Copilot. The website reflects a mature, enterprise-grade service with consistent branding and high-quality content.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, robust security headers, and a clear cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The presence of certifications like ISO 27001 and SOC attest to Microsoft's commitment to security. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating readiness to handle security incidents. However, the lack of visible direct contact channels for security incidents on this page suggests room for improvement in transparency. Overall, the security maturity is high with minor recommendations for enhanced incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and publish accurate WHOIS domain registration information to enhance trust.
  2. Add explicit security incident contact information on the website for improved transparency.
  3. Continue regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance user awareness of data retention policies and privacy practices.
  5. Maintain and update security headers and TLS configurations to current best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Microsoft Corporation
Description
Collaborate for free with online versions of Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, Excel, and OneNote. Save documents, workbooks, and presentations online, in OneDrive. Share them with others and work together at the same time.
Key services
Microsoft 365 suite, OneDrive cloud storage, Office Online apps, Microsoft 365 Copilot
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Azure CDN, Microsoft Graph API, Office UI Fabric
Frameworks
React (likely), Microsoft Fluent UI
Platforms
Microsoft Azure
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of secure cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Azure Monitor, Microsoft Clarity (possible)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Azure Monitor Analytics
Marketing tools
Microsoft Advertising, Azure Monitor
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong Microsoft branding and product focus on Microsoft 365 services.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  5. Security best practices are implemented including HTTPS and security headers.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain is not registered, which is unusual for Microsoft domains.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Use of multiple Microsoft-owned domains and CDNs for resources.
  9. No suspicious external domains or partners detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Microsoft Azure CDN for hosting. It likely employs React and Microsoft Fluent UI frameworks for UI components. Performance is optimized with preloaded fonts and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and structured data. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting on Microsoft Azure ensures scalability and reliability. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities to further enhance accessibility and incident response integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 92/100 +2Low18 findingsView report
  2. 90/100 +12Low19 findingsView report
  3. 78/100Low18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with microsoft365.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review microsoft365.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.