Skip to main content

Security report for microdata.nu

MicroData Skandinavien AB · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MicroData Skandinavien AB operates a professional website focused on digital personnel archiving and document management solutions, primarily targeting organizations in the public sector and enterprises in Sweden. Their offerings include MicroWeb Personalarkiv, e-Arkiv, Långtidsarkiv, and related digital HR services. The company positions itself as a trusted provider with a strong emphasis on GDPR compliance and security. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure using WordPress with Elementor and Astra theme, enhanced by Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Hubspot for marketing and analytics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie policies and GDPR information. The site includes customer testimonials and references, enhancing trust and credibility. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and compliant with relevant regulations, supporting MicroData's market position as a reliable technology provider in the Scandinavian region.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching microdata.nu

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention microdata.nu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for microdata.nu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MicroData targets B2B clients needing secure and efficient digital archiving and HR process automation. Their business model revolves around software and service delivery with a focus on compliance and digital transformation. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics platforms like Hubspot and Leadfeeder to enhance customer engagement. The presence of multiple public sector references and testimonials indicates a strong foothold in this segment. The company maintains consistent branding and content quality, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated, suggesting independent operation. The use of Cookiebot and GDPR pages reflects a proactive compliance stance, important for their target market.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for managing cookie consent, which is a positive security and privacy practice. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were not identified, representing an area for improvement. There is no visible incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could enhance security readiness and transparency. The integration of third-party scripts (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hubspot) is managed with consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adding security headers and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response contact or security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance visibility of security policies and certifications to build further trust with clients.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
MicroData Skandinavien AB
Registration number
556569-2513
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MicroData Skandinavien AB
Description
Vi levererar säkra dokument- & ärendehanteringstjänster med fokus på digital personalarkiv och informationsförvaltning.
Key services
MicroWeb Personalarkiv, MicroWeb e-Arkiv, MicroWeb Långtidsarkiv, MicroWeb Fakturaarkiv, MicroWeb Samtyckeshantering, Digitala processer, Digitala signaturer, Automatisk Datafångst
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Swiper, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Astra WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security storage consent granted only

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hubspot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hubspot tracking, Leadfeeder tracking
Marketing tools
Hubspot forms, Cookiebot consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for cookie consent and compliance.
  2. Multiple customer testimonials and references to public sector clients.
  3. Strong focus on GDPR compliance and security.
  4. Use of modern WordPress theme and Elementor page builder.
  5. No visible security or content blocking issues.
  6. Comprehensive cookie declaration with detailed cookie categories.
  7. No explicit terms of service found.
  8. Contact information primarily via contact form and social media links.
  9. No explicit security incident response contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a flexible and widely supported infrastructure. The use of Cookiebot for consent management and Hubspot for marketing automation shows integration with advanced digital tools. Performance appears moderate with standard optimization practices; mobile responsiveness and accessibility are good. The site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper for UI components. There is no explicit hosting provider information, but the domain and SSL configuration are well maintained. Opportunities exist to improve technical security measures and possibly enhance performance through further optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with microdata.nu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review microdata.nu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.