Skip to main content

Security report for mhweb.cz

MH PC Servis s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MH PC Servis s.r.o. is a Czech Republic based small IT service company founded in 2012, specializing in computer repair, external PC network management, sales of computing equipment, and installation of security and camera systems. The company targets both businesses and individual customers seeking reliable IT solutions and remote support services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear presentation of key services and contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, uses modern libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome, and integrates analytics tools including Matomo and Google Analytics. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and secure forms, but lacks published security policies and headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with business claims. Overall, the website is trustworthy and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mhweb.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Technology sector providing essential IT services including hardware repair, network management, and security system installation. Its business model focuses on service outsourcing and direct sales, targeting local and regional markets in the Czech Republic. The firm maintains a modest online presence with social media on Facebook and Instagram, and uses a helpdesk system for remote support. The website content and structured data indicate a stable, small-sized enterprise with a clear market niche. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company leverages modern web technologies and analytics to support marketing and customer engagement. Growth indicators include active blog posts and service updates. Strategic partnerships or payment processors are not explicitly identified on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks implementation of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response plan, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts requires proper user consent management to avoid privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices in security headers, policy publication, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a robust security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MH PC Servis s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MH PC Servis s.r.o.
Description
Zabýváme se externí správou PC sítí (outsourcing), servisem a prodejem výpočetní techniky, a kamerovými a zabezpečovacími systémy
Key services
Servis výpočetní techniky, Správa PC sítí, Zabezpečovací systémy, Vzdálená podpora
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, WooCommerce 10.3.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 5.15.3, Owl Carousel, Yoast SEO plugin, Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics (via Site Kit), Google Fonts (Poppins)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WooCommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms for remote support and service requests

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to IT service industry.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  6. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  7. Social media presence is limited but present (Facebook, Instagram).
  8. Domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency of business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses popular JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components and Font Awesome for icons. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format is implemented for rich search results. Analytics are managed through Matomo and Google Analytics integrated via Google Site Kit. The site is hosted under a Czech registrar REG-INTERNET-CZ with nameservers indicating local hosting. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility is basic. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, which are areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but can be improved for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mhweb.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mhweb.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.