Skip to main content

Security report for mhff.cz

Město Teplice nad Metují · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mhff.cz represents the 42nd International Mountaineering Film Festival held in Teplice nad Metují, Czech Republic. It serves as an event platform showcasing films related to mountaineering and sports, targeting enthusiasts and the general public interested in outdoor and cultural activities. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supported by strong partnerships with recognized outdoor and media brands. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, SVG graphics, and JavaScript for interactive effects. It is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but lacks security headers and published security policies. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security and compliance perspective, the site lacks a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The WHOIS data shows a consistent domain registration dating back to 2017, appropriate for the festival's history, with no suspicious patterns. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but should address privacy and security policy gaps to improve compliance and user trust. Strategic improvements in security headers and privacy disclosures are recommended to enhance the security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mhff.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
40
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mhff.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mhff.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival operates as a specialized cultural event organizer within the outdoor and sports film niche. Its market position is strong in the Czech Republic with international reach through film submissions and partnerships. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, ticket sales, and partnerships with outdoor brands. The target audience includes mountaineers, sports enthusiasts, and film lovers. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving regional government bodies, outdoor equipment brands, and media outlets, which supports growth and visibility. The business model focuses on event management and cultural promotion rather than direct product sales.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. Lack of published security policies and incident response contacts indicates limited transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or malicious scripts were detected in the provided content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with EU cookie regulations.
  3. Configure essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Město Teplice nad Metují
Registration number
273139
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Teplice nad Metují
Description
Mezinárodní horolezecký filmový festival je soutěžní přehlídka filmů z celého světa s horolezeckou i jinou sportovní tématikou.
Key services
organizace filmového festivalu, prezentace horolezeckých a sportovních filmů, partnerství s outdoorovými značkami
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Bootstrap, SVG, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No suspicious scripts detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional, well-branded event site for an international mountaineering film festival.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage or main content to collect user data.
  5. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is used.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. Partner logos indicate strong relationships with outdoor and media brands.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, SVG for scalable graphics, and JavaScript for interactive animations. The site is mobile-optimized and includes preloading of fonts for performance. No CMS or backend technologies are explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing image delivery and caching. Accessibility is basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing social media sharing. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mhff.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mhff.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.