Skip to main content

Security report for mfocus.lv

MFocus · Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MFocus is a Latvian-based professional service provider specializing in supervision sessions aimed at individual employees, groups, and teams to improve workplace communication, reduce stress, and foster personal and professional growth. The website presents a clear business focus on supervision and coaching services, supported by client testimonials and detailed descriptions of methodologies and benefits. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with modern web technologies and Google Analytics integration. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which limits domain registration transparency. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, serving a niche market in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mfocus.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MFocus operates in the professional development and supervision sector, targeting organizations and individuals seeking to improve workplace dynamics and reduce stress. The business model is service-oriented, offering tailored supervision sessions in individual, group, and team formats. The presence of reputable client logos such as Deloitte and DelfinGroup indicates established partnerships and market credibility. The company leverages strategic planning and mindfulness techniques, positioning itself as a specialist in stress management and organizational communication. Growth potential lies in expanding client base and formalizing compliance documentation to enhance trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, it lacks several important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating room for improvement in transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add essential HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  4. Publish security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to maintain security and performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MFocus
Description
Supervīzija palīdz uzņēmumiem rast iespējas, kā efektīvi strukturizēt darbu un veicināt darbinieku personīgo un profesionālo attīstību!
Key services
Individual supervision sessions, Group supervision sessions, Team supervision sessions, Stress management and mindfulness coaching, Strategic planning facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor page builder, Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Latvian language with English metadata.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional HTTP headers and explicit policies.
  7. Business is a small professional service provider focused on supervision and coaching.
  8. Client testimonials and detailed service descriptions enhance trust.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for traffic analysis. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. No hosting provider details were found. The site uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, enhancing security against automated abuse. Overall, the technical stack is standard for small professional service websites, with opportunities for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mfocus.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mfocus.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.