Skip to main content

Security report for mfcc.cz

Massimo Filippi s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Massimo Filippi s.r.o. is a small creative studio based in Prague, Czech Republic, offering services likely related to marketing, advertising, and design. The website presents a professional image with a clean design, client logos, and clear contact information, positioning the company as an established local player in the creative sector. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging HTTPS, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, and a custom CMS platform called solidpixels. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust slightly, but the overall business credibility remains moderate to good based on website content and contact details. No forms or analytics scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection and tracking. No adult or questionable content is present, making the site safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mfcc.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mfcc.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mfcc.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the creative services sector, targeting clients and partners in marketing and advertising. The presence of well-known client logos suggests a solid partnership ecosystem and a reputable market position. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on creative studio offerings. The company is small-sized with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting trustworthiness. The lack of detailed business history or founding year limits deeper business intelligence insights. The company maintains active social media profiles on Facebook and LinkedIn, enhancing its digital presence and client engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and handling of security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate security issue reporting and management.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
  5. Enhance website analytics and tracking transparency to align with privacy best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Massimo Filippi s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ28169565
Registration number
28169565
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Massimo Filippi s.r.o.
Description
Massimo Filippi s.r.o. is a studio based in Prague, Czech Republic, providing creative or agency-related services, as inferred from client logos and business presentation.
Key services
Creative studio services, Marketing and advertising collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Maps API, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
solidpixels.
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook and LinkedIn with official company pages.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies with a custom CMS (solidpixels).
  7. No forms detected on the homepage or main content to analyze for data collection.
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Maps API.
  10. Business appears to be a small creative studio based in Prague with notable clients.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Fonts, Google Maps API, and a custom CMS platform named solidpixels. The HTML and CSS are valid and the site is mobile optimized, providing a good user experience. Performance is moderate with no significant delays detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic compliance. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts beyond Google Maps API were found, indicating minimal data collection. The technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with improved accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mfcc.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mfcc.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.