Skip to main content

Security report for mexcourier.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

28/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed content corresponds to a Chrome internal error page (chrome-error://chromewebdata/) which indicates that the actual website content for the domain 'chromewebdata' or 'www.mexcourier.com' is not accessible. No business-related content, metadata, or structured data is present to evaluate the company, services, or market position. The page primarily contains embedded Chromium offline dinosaur game scripts and styles, which are standard for Chrome's offline error pages. Due to the lack of accessible content, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, nor is there any contact or security policy information. The absence of WHOIS data further limits domain legitimacy analysis. Overall, the website is effectively inaccessible for meaningful analysis, resulting in a low AI score and no trust or business credibility indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

    • High

      No Name Servers Found

      Unable to find name servers for domain

      What to do: Configure proper name servers for the domain

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mexcourier.com

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
60
DNS health
25
GDPR outside view
25
Average
28

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from the provided content as it is a browser error page with no company information, descriptions, or services. No external links, social media, or partner domains are present. The domain's business model, market position, and target audience cannot be determined.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the lack of accessible website content. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available. The page is served as a local Chrome error page, so no external security policies or incident response contacts are present. The embedded scripts are standard Chromium code for the offline dinosaur game, which is secure by design but unrelated to the domain's security.

Recommendations

  1. Ensure the website is properly hosted and accessible over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies on accessible pages.
  3. Provide verifiable contact information including security incident contacts.
  4. Implement security headers and conduct regular security audits.
  5. Provide WHOIS data and domain registration transparency to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. Content is a Chrome internal error page (chrome-error://chromewebdata/) indicating no external website content is accessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
No business description or company information found in the content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Chromium BSD-licensed code
Platforms
Web Browser
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. The content is a Chrome internal error page indicating the requested website content is not accessible.
  2. No actual website content, metadata, or business information is present.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or security policies are available.
  5. No external links or social media references detected.
  6. The page contains embedded Chromium offline dinosaur game scripts and styles.
  7. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No WHOIS data provided for domain analysis.
  9. Website is effectively inaccessible for analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The technical content is limited to Chromium's offline dinosaur game scripts and styles embedded in the error page. The page uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with no external libraries or CMS detected. No analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies are present. The page is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features for the game. However, this content is unrelated to the actual website and indicates the site is not reachable.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mexcourier.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mexcourier.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.