Skip to main content

Security report for metronik.net

Metronik · Manufacturing · Slovenia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Metronik is a well-established company specializing in innovative automation and digitalization solutions primarily serving industrial, smart building, and infrastructure sectors. With over 30 years of experience and a medium-sized workforce spread across multiple countries, Metronik holds a strong market position in Slovenia and the wider European region. Their offerings include advanced HVAC automation, production process control, energy management, and cloud-based IIoT platforms, supported by partnerships with global manufacturers and a portfolio of notable clients. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content and professional branding. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO optimizations, delivering a good user experience and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance evident through detailed policies and cookie consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found, supporting a high legitimacy score. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a formal security policy, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching metronik.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Metronik operates as a B2B solutions provider focused on manufacturing and infrastructure sectors, leveraging over three decades of expertise. Their competitive advantage lies in combining global partnerships with in-house developed solutions, targeting clients seeking automation and digital transformation. Revenue streams likely include consulting, system integration, software platforms, and ongoing support services. The company targets industrial manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, smart building operators, and infrastructure firms across Europe. Growth indicators include a broad client base with references to major companies and active marketing via newsletters and events. The partnership ecosystem includes digitalization platforms like MePIS. Overall, Metronik demonstrates a stable and credible business model with a clear focus on innovation and quality.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of privacy and cookie management plugins ensuring GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident and should be implemented to mitigate common web risks. Incident response and security policy documentation are absent, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The presence of security certifications like ISO 27001 suggests internal security governance, though this is not detailed on the site. Overall, the security maturity is good but can benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Metronik d.o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Metronik
Description
Metronik is an established provider of innovative solutions for automation and digitalization in industry, smart buildings, and infrastructure companies.
Key services
Automation of HVAC and energy systems, Production process automation, Central control systems, Energy management, Operational and technical consulting, IIoT cloud platform, Data analytics with AI, Serialization and track & trace, Manufacturing Execution System (MES), Data management and reporting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Ninja Forms, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics (via Site Kit), Mailchimp for WP, Complianz GDPR plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, MediaElement.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML
  • Use of security/privacy plugins (Complianz, Uncode Privacy)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mailchimp tracking
Marketing tools
Mailchimp, Google Site Kit
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  3. Strong business presence with detailed service offerings and client references
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices
  5. No critical security issues detected
  6. Active use of Google Analytics and Mailchimp for marketing and analytics
  7. Contact information clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Ninja Forms, Slider Revolution, and Complianz GDPR plugins. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and MediaElement.js for media handling. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated via Google Site Kit, and Mailchimp is used for newsletter management. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with some heavy media content (videos, large images). Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website with room for performance optimization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with metronik.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review metronik.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.