Skip to main content

Security report for metaforce.se

Metaforce · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Metaforce is a Swedish technology company specializing in customer communication management through its SaaS platform Centerpoint. The platform enables businesses to orchestrate all customer communications, including print, PDFs, and smart online dialogs, integrating seamlessly with core business systems. Established in 2003, Metaforce serves large enterprises such as insurance companies, banks, and government agencies, emphasizing security and compliance with ISO 27001 and ISO 27018 certifications. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content focused on business benefits and security assurances. Technically, the site leverages HubSpot CMS and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, maintaining good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and privacy consent mechanisms, though incident response and vulnerability disclosure details are absent. Overall, the site projects high trustworthiness and professionalism, supporting Metaforce's market position as a reliable CCM provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching metaforce.se

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention metaforce.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for metaforce.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Metaforce operates in the technology sector, providing a specialized CCM platform that addresses the needs of regulated industries requiring secure and compliant customer communications. Their business model is SaaS-based, targeting medium to large enterprises with complex communication workflows. The company demonstrates competitive advantages through its ISO certifications, integration capabilities, and support for both traditional and digital communication channels. The presence of customer testimonials and a security hub enhances credibility. The company’s growth is supported by a clear partnership ecosystem and a focus on digital transformation. The website content and structure indicate a strategic emphasis on security, compliance, and ease of use, aligning with market demands for trustworthy communication solutions.

Security posture

Metaforce exhibits a mature security posture with adherence to international standards ISO 27001 and ISO 27018, indicating robust information security and privacy controls. The website enforces HTTPS and includes multiple security headers, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms comply with GDPR, reflecting strong data protection practices. However, the absence of explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Overall, the security culture appears proactive and aligned with industry best practices, supporting business-critical communication needs.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add terms of service documentation to complete legal and compliance coverage.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance as regulations evolve.
  5. Enhance website performance optimization to improve loading speed and user experience further.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Metaforce
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Metaforce
Description
Metaforce offers Centerpoint, a customer communication management (CCM) platform that integrates with core business systems to orchestrate documents and online dialogs from one platform, supporting print, PDF, and smart online dialogs.
Key services
Customer communication management platform, Document creation, distribution, automation, signing, and archiving, Integration with business systems via REST APIs, Support for print, PDF, and online dialogs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Ads Pixel, REST APIs
Frameworks
HubSpot platform
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISO 27001 and ISO 27018 certifications
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Privacy consent listeners for analytics and ads
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong emphasis on security and compliance with ISO certifications.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. No terms of service found, which is a minor gap.
  5. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
  6. Use of HubSpot CMS and marketing/analytics tools is extensive.
  7. Contact information is clear and includes physical addresses and email.
  8. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The technical implementation includes responsive design, accessibility features, and SEO best practices. Hosting and infrastructure are managed by HubSpot, ensuring reliable uptime and security. Performance is moderate, with opportunities for optimization. The site uses REST APIs for integration, supporting extensibility and interoperability. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were identified, indicating a well-maintained digital infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with metaforce.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review metaforce.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.