Skip to main content

Security report for mestobystrice.cz

Město Bystřice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Město Bystřice operates an official municipal website serving the local community of Bystřice in the Czech Republic. The site provides extensive information about the town's governance, public services, events, and administrative procedures. It targets residents and stakeholders seeking municipal resources and updates. The website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience across devices. However, some technical aspects such as security headers and privacy policies are lacking or not publicly visible, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the content and structure strongly indicate a legitimate government entity. Overall, the site is professionally maintained with good content quality and navigation clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mestobystrice.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mestobystrice.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
29%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mestobystrice.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as the primary digital presence for the town of Bystřice, offering a broad range of municipal services and information. Its business model is centered on public service rather than commercial revenue, focusing on transparency and citizen engagement. The site includes interactive forms, budget disclosures, and strategic planning documents, reflecting a commitment to open governance. The presence of a citizen portal and detailed contact information supports community interaction. While no direct revenue streams or partnerships are evident, the site links to a municipal portal and external trusted services. Growth indicators include regular updates and comprehensive event calendars. The site’s ecosystem is primarily local government focused, with no commercial subsidiaries or parent companies identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in security transparency. The use of common JavaScript libraries is noted, but no evidence of outdated or vulnerable versions was found in the provided data. The site does not expose sensitive data or credentials in the HTML. To improve security maturity, the municipality should implement recommended HTTP security headers, publish a privacy policy, and establish a vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file.
  4. Conduct a security audit of third-party libraries and update them regularly to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and broaden user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Bystřice
Description
Official website of the town Bystřice (okres Benešov), the only Bystřice located in Central Bohemia, with history dating back to the 14th century and 26 city parts.
Key services
Municipal news and updates, Public administration information, Interactive forms and applications, Event calendars, Public tenders and budget information, Contact information and citizen portal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper 4.5.0, jQuery Mmenu 7.0.6, Highslide JS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal website with comprehensive local government content
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to registry restrictions or query issues
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed user options
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main site
  5. Uses common web technologies and libraries
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. Contact information clearly presented with official email and phone
  9. External links mostly to trusted domains and municipal portals
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform likely based on GCM, utilizing Bootstrap 4.4.1 for responsive design and jQuery for DOM manipulation. It integrates Swiper for sliders and jQuery Mmenu for mobile navigation. External resources are loaded from trusted CDNs such as Cloudflare and StackPath. The site includes a cookie consent script and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and has clear navigation menus with deep hierarchical structure. No hosting provider details were found. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mestobystrice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mestobystrice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.