Skip to main content

Security report for merchorders.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

74/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website merchorders.com is currently inaccessible due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) protection by Incapsula, which blocks direct content access. As a result, no business content, metadata, or contact information is available for analysis. The domain is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC since 2018 and uses AWS DNS servers, indicating a legitimate commercial intent. However, the lack of accessible content and absence of privacy or security policies limit the ability to assess the business model or market position. Technically, the site shows no evidence of modern SEO, security headers, or compliance mechanisms. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible HTTPS or security best practices. Overall, the site appears to be a small business or e-commerce platform but cannot be fully evaluated due to content blocking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching merchorders.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention merchorders.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
49
Employees
0
Customers
49
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
2%

17 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for merchorders.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the WAF blocking, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the website content. The domain age and registrar suggest a stable registration since 2018. The domain name implies a focus on merchandise ordering, likely targeting retail or e-commerce customers. No partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators are visible. The business model and revenue streams cannot be confirmed. No contact or social media presence is detectable from the provided data.

Security posture

The security posture is currently poor as the site is protected by Incapsula WAF, which blocks content access. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR or other regulations. Incident response contacts and security policies are not found. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, which is positive for trust. Overall, the site needs improvements in security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and ensure all pages are served securely.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Add clear contact information including support and incident response emails.
  5. Review and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Incapsula detected. Page content is blocked by Incapsula WAF as indicated by iframe with Incapsula incident ID and minimal HTML content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Incapsula WAF blocking.
  2. No metadata, forms, scripts, or business content available for analysis.
  3. No contact information or policies found in the HTML content.
  4. Domain WHOIS data is publicly available and consistent with a legitimate commercial domain.
  5. Technical infrastructure uses AWS DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  7. Website likely intended for e-commerce or merchandising based on domain name but no content to confirm.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted with DNS managed by AWS DNS servers, indicating use of Amazon Web Services infrastructure. The HTML content is minimal and consists solely of an iframe referencing an Incapsula resource, indicating the site is behind a WAF. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics scripts are detectable. The site lacks metadata, SEO tags, or structured data. Performance and accessibility cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The technical debt is high given the lack of visible modern web practices and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with merchorders.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review merchorders.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.