Skip to main content

Security report for mera.com

Technology · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mera.com currently hosts a default CentOS welcome page, indicating it is either parked or used as a placeholder for the CentOS Linux distribution community. CentOS is a well-known open-source enterprise Linux distribution derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux, targeting system administrators, enterprise users, and Linux enthusiasts. The site provides links to official CentOS resources but lacks unique business content or services. Technically, the site is very basic, using simple HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which limits compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data shows the domain is long-established and registered through a reputable registrar, supporting legitimacy but not active business use. Overall, the site has minimal content and technical sophistication, with significant room for improvement in security, privacy, and user engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mera.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mera.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
246
Employees
6
Customers
227
Third parties
13
Weak passwords
19%

Latest record dated 2026-05-27 · 8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mera.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –redmine.mera.com2026-05-27
  • –helpdesk.mera.com2025-08-18
  • –team.mera.com2025-07-01
  • –owa.mera.com2025-04-14
  • –helpdesk.mera.com2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain mera.com is associated with CentOS, a community-driven Linux distribution project. The business model is open source and community-supported, with no direct commercial services evident on this site. The target audience includes IT professionals and Linux users. The site acts as a gateway to official CentOS resources rather than a standalone business. There are no visible revenue streams or partnerships indicated. The domain age and registration are consistent with a mature open-source project. The lack of contact or business information suggests this domain is not actively used for commercial purposes.

Security posture

The website lacks HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security best practices. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content, but the lack of HTTPS is a critical security gap. The security score is low, and the site would benefit from implementing SSL/TLS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures to improve trust and protect users.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response contact channel for security issues.
  5. Improve website design and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
CentOS is an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution derived from sources freely provided to the public by Red Hat, Inc. for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. It aims to be functionally compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux and is developed by a small but growing team of core developers supported by an active user community.
Key services
Linux distribution, Community support, Mirror network, Special Interest Groups (SIGs), Bug tracking and QA
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is a default CentOS welcome page, indicating the domain is likely parked or not actively used for a unique business.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS detected in the provided data.
  5. External links point exclusively to official CentOS resources.
  6. No scripts, analytics, or tracking technologies detected.
  7. Website is basic with minimal content and no advanced features.
  8. WHOIS data shows a long-registered domain with no suspicious patterns.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. There is no evidence of modern web technologies or performance optimization. The site is not mobile-optimized and lacks accessibility features. External links point to official CentOS resources, indicating a focus on community information rather than commercial activity. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is minimal and could be modernized to improve performance, security, and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mera.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mera.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.