Skip to main content

Security report for meinlb.de

Mein LB · Other · Germany

Partial score · DNS & email only

51/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mein LB is a German-language website focused on local community events and information, likely serving the Ludwigsburg area. The site uses WordPress CMS with plugins such as Modern Events Calendar and Yoast SEO to manage event listings and optimize search engine presence. The technical infrastructure is moderate, hosted by hostpress.de, and the site shows basic mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are critical for compliance and trust. No evidence of security incident response or certifications was found, indicating a low maturity in security posture. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and business transparency to enhance trust and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching meinlb.de

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
Average
51

Not counted

  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a niche local market, providing event information and possibly other community-related content. Its business model appears to be informational, serving residents or visitors of the Ludwigsburg area. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or contact data limits the assessment of its market position and growth potential. The use of common WordPress plugins suggests a standard approach to content management without advanced customizations or integrations. There is no indication of revenue streams or partnerships from the available data.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of security headers, lack of visible SSL/TLS configuration details, and no disclosed security policies or incident response contacts. The site does not implement GDPR compliance indicators such as privacy or cookie policies, which is a significant compliance gap for a German-based website. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, and no evidence of secure form handling was detected. These factors suggest a need for urgent security and compliance improvements to protect user data and maintain regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish security incident response procedures and provide dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mein LB
Description
The website appears to be a local or community-oriented platform, possibly related to events or local information in the Ludwigsburg area (inferred from 'LB' and German language). It uses German language and targets German-speaking users.
Key services
Event listings, Local news or information
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Modern Events Calendar plugin, WP Timelines plugin, Pannellum (panorama viewer), FontAwesome, Select2, jQuery (implied by plugins)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. Content is primarily in German and focused on local community events.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the main page content.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for events and SEO.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. No business registration or certification information found.
  10. No forms with identifiable fields found in the truncated HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress and uses several popular plugins for event management and SEO optimization. Hosting is provided by hostpress.de, a known hosting provider. The site loads multiple font resources and scripts, including FontAwesome and Select2, indicating a moderately modern tech stack. Performance appears moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. However, the absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and regulatory adherence. There is an opportunity to improve accessibility and SEO further by adding ARIA attributes and structured data for business and contact information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with meinlb.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review meinlb.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.