Skip to main content

Security report for mega.com

MEGA International · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MEGA International is an established enterprise SaaS solutions provider specializing in enterprise architecture, business process management, governance, risk and compliance, and data governance. The company holds a strong market position as a leader in enterprise architecture tools, recognized by Gartner for 16 consecutive years. Their HOPEX platform offers collaborative, AI-driven capabilities to accelerate digital transformation for large enterprises. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 with modern front-end frameworks and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools. However, a critical security gap exists due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, undermining HTTPS security. While security headers are well configured, the lack of TLS support poses a significant risk. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism and business credibility but requires urgent remediation of SSL/TLS issues to ensure secure user interactions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mega.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
95
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MEGA International targets enterprise customers seeking comprehensive digital transformation solutions. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS with modular offerings tailored to enterprise architecture, risk management, and data governance. The company leverages strategic partnerships and acquisitions to strengthen market presence. Their marketing ecosystem includes advanced tracking and retargeting tools, supporting extensive user engagement and lead generation. The company’s longevity and Gartner recognition underscore competitive advantages and market leadership. Growth indicators include recent acquisitions and active community engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes notable players like Bizzdesign and Alfabet, enhancing solution breadth.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with strong HTTP security headers and privacy policies. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential data interception and undermine trust. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing tools necessitates vigilant data protection practices. Overall, the security posture requires immediate improvement in SSL/TLS deployment and enhanced incident response visibility to align with best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and configure OCSP stapling and session resumption for performance and security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize risk.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and broaden audience reach.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Drupal 10 CMS with Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, hosted on AWS infrastructure. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and multiple marketing platforms such as Pardot, Zoho, and Salesforce. Performance metrics indicate slow loading times, suggesting optimization opportunities. The site is mobile-optimized with basic accessibility features. Security headers are well implemented, but the lack of SSL/TLS is a major technical deficiency. The site structure and metadata are well configured for SEO. Technical debt includes outdated or missing SSL configuration and potential performance bottlenecks due to extensive third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mega.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mega.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.