State of Maryland · Government · United States
Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
Maryland.gov is the official digital portal for the State of Maryland, providing a centralized platform for residents, businesses, visitors, and government employees to access a wide range of state government services and information. The website serves as a comprehensive resource for online services, job listings, business registrations, government contacts, and educational resources, positioning itself as the authoritative source for Maryland state government digital interactions. The site demonstrates consistent branding and high content quality, reflecting its role as a trusted government entity. Technically, the website leverages a mature technology stack including Microsoft SharePoint, ASP.NET Web Forms, jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates modern analytics and accessibility tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Monsido. The platform is well-optimized for mobile devices and incorporates accessibility best practices, ensuring broad usability. Hosting appears to be managed by state infrastructure with partial Cloudflare services for analytics. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and employs security tokens to protect form submissions. While some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, the overall posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, with GDPR considerations addressed. The domain's WHOIS data is incomplete, likely due to .gov domain registry policies, but the .gov TLD and website content strongly affirm legitimacy. Overall, Maryland.gov presents a secure, professional, and user-friendly government portal with robust technical infrastructure and compliance measures. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure, and continuous auditing of third-party scripts to maintain security integrity.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention md.gov, from OffSeq Breach.
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for md.gov.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with md.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review md.gov.