Skip to main content

Security report for mcsrvstat.us

Anders G. Jørgensen · Technology · Denmark

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Minecraft Server Status is a niche technology service providing quick and reliable information about Minecraft servers, supporting both Java and Bedrock editions. The website is operated by Anders G. Jørgensen, based in Denmark, with a domain registered since 2015, indicating a stable and mature service. The business model is ad-free and supported by donations, targeting Minecraft players and server administrators seeking server status information and API access. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 5 and Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and a professional design, although it lacks some compliance documentation such as privacy and cookie policies. From a security perspective, the domain benefits from Cloudflare's infrastructure and has domain transfer protections enabled. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy, and well-positioned within its niche but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency to improve its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mcsrvstat.us

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The service occupies a niche market focused on Minecraft server status monitoring, offering both a user-facing website and an API for integration. Its competitive advantage lies in its ad-free approach and donation-supported model, appealing to users seeking an uninterrupted experience. The target customers are Minecraft players and server operators who require quick server status checks. The company operates independently without known subsidiaries or parent companies. The partnership ecosystem is limited, with no explicit partner domains identified. Growth indicators include a stable domain age and consistent service offering since 2015.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN provides baseline protection and performance benefits. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain hijacking protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could hinder timely response to security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to facilitate incident reporting.
  5. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anders G. Jørgensen
Description
Provides quick information about Minecraft servers including status and details for Java and Bedrock editions.
Key services
Minecraft server status checking, API access for server data, System status monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.3, Bootstrap Icons 1.11.3, Cloudflare DNS, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare nameservers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is ad-free and requests donations to maintain service.
  2. Focuses exclusively on Minecraft server status and related services.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers provided on the site.
  5. Uses modern frontend technologies and is mobile optimized.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services.
  9. No social media links or company contact emails found.
  10. WHOIS data shows domain expires in 34 days, renewal recommended.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 5 and Bootstrap Icons, ensuring a responsive and modern user interface. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, which supports fast loading times and global availability. The HTML structure is valid and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. JavaScript is used for UI interactions and analytics via Cloudflare Insights. The site is mobile optimized and performs well, with no broken elements observed. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include adding security headers and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mcsrvstat.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mcsrvstat.us.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.