Skip to main content

Security report for mca.org.mt

Malta Communications Authority · Telecommunications · Malta

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Malta Communications Authority (MCA) is a government regulatory body overseeing the communications sector in Malta, including telecommunications, digital services, spectrum management, and consumer protection. The website serves as an official portal providing regulatory information, consumer resources, publications, and online services such as payments and forms. It targets consumers, industry stakeholders, and government entities, positioning itself as the authoritative communications regulator in Malta. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js for interactive elements, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, though performance is moderate. The presence of HTTPS and secure form handling indicates a solid security foundation. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a formal security or incident response policy page suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present and GDPR compliance implied, but lacking a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the MCA website is a professional, trustworthy, and functional government site with a good balance of content quality and technical implementation. Strategic enhancements in privacy compliance and security transparency would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mca.org.mt

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MCA operates as a national regulatory authority in the telecommunications sector, providing oversight, compliance enforcement, and consumer protection. Its business model is regulatory and service-oriented, funded by government allocations and regulatory fees. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear segmentation for consumers and industry, offering publications, consultations, and online services. The organization maintains active social media channels to engage stakeholders. The absence of commercial advertising and affiliate links aligns with its government status. The site supports transparency and public engagement through accessible reports and consultation documents.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from automated abuse. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a gap. There is no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could hinder timely reporting and remediation of security issues. The site demonstrates good security hygiene but would benefit from enhanced security policies and headers to mitigate risks further.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and inform users about cookie usage.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to ensure no known vulnerabilities are present.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Malta Communications Authority
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Malta Communications Authority
Description
The Malta Communications Authority is a government entity responsible for regulating the communications sector in Malta, including telecommunications, digital services, spectrum management, and consumer protection.
Key services
Consumer protection, Regulatory decisions and consultations, Spectrum licensing and technology management, Online services including payments and forms, Publications and reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10 CMS, jQuery, jQuery UI, Swiper.js, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Pikaday datepicker, Smooth Scroll library
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form inputs with validation and CAPTCHA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is comprehensive for a government regulatory authority
  3. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices
  5. Contact information is clearly presented and includes phone and physical address
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  8. Social media presence is official and consistent with organization
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 10 CMS, a modern and secure content management system suitable for government websites. It incorporates popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components and user interaction. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used to protect forms from spam and abuse. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs, including jsDelivr and code.jquery.com. Performance is moderate, likely due to the use of multiple CSS and JS assets, but mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed. There is no explicit hosting provider information detected. The site uses canonical URLs and meta tags effectively for SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mca.org.mt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mca.org.mt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.