Skip to main content

Security report for mbr-rlp-nord.de

Government · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mbr-rlp-nord.de serves as a regional support and advisory platform focused on combating right-wing extremism, racism, and antisemitism in the northern Rheinland-Pfalz region of Germany. It targets engaged civil society actors, organizations, and institutions, providing assistance in dealing with extremist activities and promoting democratic values. The site is hosted on WordPress.com, leveraging standard WordPress technologies and plugins, with a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid due to HTTPS and managed hosting, but lacks explicit security headers and formal policies. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and no contact information for data protection or incident response. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mbr-rlp-nord.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mbr-rlp-nord.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mbr-rlp-nord.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as a small, government or non-profit entity providing specialized advisory services in a niche social sector. It is regionally focused with clear governmental funding and coordination, indicating stable backing and a defined target audience. The business model is service-oriented, relying on public funding and partnerships with governmental bodies. The lack of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit nature. The partnership with the Ministry for Family, Women, Culture and Integration Rheinland-Pfalz and coordination by the Mobile Beratung gegen Rechtsextremismus Rheinland-Pfalz strengthens its credibility and operational ecosystem.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate to good, benefiting from WordPress.com hosting with HTTPS and managed infrastructure. However, the absence of explicit security headers, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and incident response contacts limits the security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site should improve by adding formal security policies, privacy notices, and security.txt files to enhance trust and compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for incident response and data protection officer to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Die Regionalstelle Nord unterstützt Personen und Organisationen, die mit Rechtsextremismus, Rassismus und Antisemitismus konfrontiert sind und sich dagegen wenden möchten. Zuständig für die kreisfreie Stadt Koblenz und mehrere umliegende Kreise in Rheinland-Pfalz. Unterstützt bei der Auseinandersetzung mit Rassismus, Antisemitismus, Verschwörungsideologien, Demokratiefeindschaft, rechtsextremen Aktivitäten und Anfeindungen. Zielgruppe sind engagierte Akteur*innen aus Zivilgesellschaft, Organisationen und Institutionen in verschiedenen Lebensbereichen wie Schule, Betrieb, Verein oder Privatleben.
Key services
Beratung und Unterstützung bei Rechtsextremismus, Rassismus, Antisemitismus, Begleitung bei rechtsextremen Aktivitäten und Anfeindungen, Kompetenzausbau für Organisationen und Institutionen
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, Google Fonts, Swiper.js, Gravatar Hovercards
Platforms
WordPress.com Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of WordPress.com managed hosting with built-in security

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted site focused on anti-right-wing extremism support in Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  4. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL and standard WordPress.com security.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. Content is in German and targeted at local/regional audience.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. Minimal user tracking via WordPress.com stats pixel.
  9. Site design and navigation are clear and professional.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS hosted on WordPress.com, utilizing plugins such as Jetpack and libraries like Swiper.js and Gravatar Hovercards. The site loads Google Fonts asynchronously and uses standard WordPress.com CDN resources. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data. Accessibility is basic with some screen reader text and skip links. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mbr-rlp-nord.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mbr-rlp-nord.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.