Skip to main content

Security report for mbajk.si

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.mbajk.si represents a business entity with an established domain since 2013, indicating a stable presence. The site is built using modern web technologies including Angular 18.2.10, Bootstrap, and integrates Matomo for analytics and Google Maps API for location services. A cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Didomi, reflecting some level of privacy compliance. However, the site lacks visible privacy policy, terms of service, and contact information, which limits transparency and user trust. The technical infrastructure appears moderately optimized with good mobile responsiveness but basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the HTML content. No forms or direct data collection points are visible, reducing immediate risk but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced compliance documentation and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mbajk.si

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind mbajk.si appears to be a small entity, possibly in a niche or local market, given the limited public business information and absence of detailed descriptions. The domain age suggests longevity but the lack of detailed business data or contact points indicates a low profile or early-stage digital presence. The use of Angular and integration of analytics and maps suggests a service or product offering that may involve location-based features or user interaction. The absence of social media links or partner domains limits visibility into the business ecosystem. The cookie consent banner and use of Matomo indicate awareness of data privacy regulations, though full compliance documentation is missing.

Security posture

Security measures on the site are basic. HTTPS is used, which is mandatory, but no security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are evident from the HTML content. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface, but the lack of visible security policies or incident response contacts is a gap. The presence of third-party scripts like Matomo and Didomi introduces potential privacy and security considerations that should be managed carefully. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard security headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Add clear contact information including business email and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Conduct a security audit of third-party scripts and ensure they comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Establish an incident response contact channel and publish it on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Angular 18.2.10, Bootstrap, Matomo Analytics, Google Maps API, Didomi Consent Management
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • Consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern Angular framework with consent management.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No contact information or business details visible on the homepage.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content; SSL status unknown but URL is HTTPS.
  6. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  7. External scripts include Matomo analytics and Google Maps API.
  8. No social media or email contacts found in the content.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain age of over 10 years, registered with a reputable registrar.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 18.2.10, indicating a modern single-page application framework. Bootstrap is used for styling, providing responsive design capabilities. The site integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking and Google Maps API for location services. Didomi SDK is used for cookie consent management, reflecting GDPR awareness. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks and stylesheets asynchronously, which is good for performance. However, SEO metadata is minimal, with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Accessibility features appear basic, and no forms or interactive input fields are present. Hosting appears to be managed via Nameshield, a known registrar and hosting provider. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mbajk.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mbajk.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.