Skip to main content

Security report for maxtraffic.com

SIA Maxtraffic · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MaxTraffic is a Latvia-based technology company founded in 2004 that offers SaaS marketing tools focused on web push notifications, overlays, and promo bars to help businesses increase customer engagement and conversion rates. The company targets e-commerce and online businesses seeking to reduce cart abandonment and improve retention. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and user experience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Nuxt.js), integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, and is hosted with a reputable registrar. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR compliance page, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in its niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maxtraffic.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention maxtraffic.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
41
Employees
1
Customers
37
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
15%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for maxtraffic.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –e.maxtraffic.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MaxTraffic operates in the marketing technology sector, providing tools that leverage exit intent technology and push notifications to improve online conversion funnels. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting small to medium businesses. The company shows strong customer validation through testimonials and trusted client logos. Their marketing ecosystem includes integrations with major platforms like Facebook and Google. The company appears stable with a long domain history and consistent WHOIS data. Growth potential is supported by modern web technologies and a focus on data-driven marketing solutions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized domain transfers, indicating good baseline security. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, and no dedicated security or incident response contact is published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Tracking technologies are used responsibly but without explicit cookie consent, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and security practices to maintain compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Maxtraffic
Description
MaxTraffic provides web push notifications, overlays, promo bars, and exit intent technology to help businesses acquire, engage, and retain customers, increase conversion rates, and reduce cart abandonment.
Key services
Web Push Notifications, Overlays & Promo Bars, Exit Intent Technology
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (Nuxt.js framework), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MaxTraffic own marketing tools, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected
  3. Clear business focus on marketing tools for web push notifications and overlays
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  5. Lacks explicit cookie consent mechanism
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business age
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js) with server-side rendering, improving SEO and performance. It uses Google Fonts and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Hosting details are limited but domain registrar is EuroDNS S.A., a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with preloading of key scripts and styles. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or framework-based solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maxtraffic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maxtraffic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.