Skip to main content

Security report for maxmarkgroup.com

MMG Group Ltd · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MMG Group Ltd is a Latvian company specializing in the production and installation of advertising products, with over 20 years of experience. Their services include outdoor advertising, illuminated signs, neon signs, digital printing, metal constructions, and POS materials. The company targets businesses seeking comprehensive advertising solutions, offering end-to-end services from design to installation and maintenance. The website reflects a well-established local market presence with numerous completed projects and notable clients. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and various plugins, hosted by a reputable registrar. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maxmarkgroup.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MMG Group Ltd holds a strong position in the Latvian advertising production sector, leveraging long-term experience and a broad client base. Their business model focuses on providing full-service advertising production and installation, which likely generates revenue through project-based contracts. The presence of well-known client logos suggests strong partnerships and a reputable brand image. The company appears to be medium-sized with a physical address and multiple contact channels. The website supports multiple languages, indicating some international or multilingual customer engagement. Growth indicators include a large number of realized projects and clients. The company does not publicly disclose parent or subsidiary relationships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA is used on the contact form to mitigate spam. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, which may impact compliance with GDPR and other regulations. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a significant compliance gap. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels is standard but requires proper user consent mechanisms to comply with privacy laws.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies that comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add an incident response contact email or page to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MMG Group Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MMG Group Ltd
Description
Kompānija MMG Group Ltd jau vairāk kā 20 gadu garumā nodarbojas ar dažādu darbu veikšanu reklāmas produkcijas ražošanā. Piedāvā pilnu pakalpojumu spektru no dizaina projekta izveidošanas līdz gatavas reklāmas konstrukcijas montāžai, ieskaitot garantijas un servisa apkopi, remontu un uzlabošanu. Darbības sfēra aptver āra reklāmas izgatavošanu un izvietošanu, piemēram, gaismas reklāmu, pilonus, neona izskārtnes, digitālo druku, metāla konstrukcijas un POS materiālus.
Key services
Gaismas reklama, Piloni, Neona izskārtnes, Digitālā druka, Metāla konstrukcijas, POS materiāli, Reklāmas konstrukciju montāža, Garantijas un servisa apkope
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Revolution Slider, Owl Carousel, Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, FancyBox, AjaxForm, mSearch2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks indicates moderate technical maturity.
  5. Security headers are missing or not visible in HTML content.
  6. Domain registration data supports legitimacy of the business.
  7. Website content is in Latvian with some Russian and English language options.
  8. Multiple client logos indicate established business relationships.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and specialized plugins like Revolution Slider and Owl Carousel for UI components. The CMS is likely MODX, inferred from component paths. Hosting is provided by Hosting Concepts B.V. The site loads asynchronously loaded analytics and tracking scripts, which is good for performance. Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Performance is moderate, with some heavy slider images that may impact load times. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maxmarkgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maxmarkgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.