Skip to main content

Security report for maximus.com

Maximus · Government · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maximus is a well-established enterprise specializing in providing technology and operational support services primarily to government agencies across federal, state, and local levels. Their offerings include customer experience solutions, technology services such as AI and cybersecurity, health services modernization, and program services that help transform policy into outcomes. The company operates globally with regional subsidiaries and maintains a strong market position as a trusted partner to public sector organizations. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates modern analytics and consent management tools such as Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg, and OneTrust. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, Maximus employs HTTPS with strong domain registration protections and cookie consent mechanisms, though DNSSEC is not enabled. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response contact is noted. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, strong business credibility, and good privacy compliance. The risk profile is low, with recommendations to enhance DNS security and publish explicit security policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maximus.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention maximus.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6,464
Employees
181
Customers
5,171
Third parties
1,112
Weak passwords
27%

Latest record dated 2026-06-04 · 95 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for maximus.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.ad.maximus.com2026-06-04
  • –sts.ad.maximus.com2026-06-01
  • –sts.ad.maximus.com2026-05-29
  • –sts.ad.maximus.com2026-05-29
  • –sts.ad.maximus.com2026-05-27

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Maximus operates in the government services sector with a diversified portfolio spanning technology, healthcare, and program management. Their business model focuses on B2G engagements, leveraging advanced technology and human-centric services to improve public service delivery. The company benefits from a global footprint with subsidiaries in key regions, enhancing local market penetration. Strategic partnerships and a comprehensive alliance ecosystem support their growth. The company’s digital presence and investor relations indicate financial stability and market leadership. Their focus on innovation and customer experience positions them competitively in the public sector technology space.

Security posture

The security posture of Maximus is solid, with HTTPS enforced and domain status locks preventing unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. The use of cookie consent banners and privacy policies aligns with GDPR and other privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. The company should consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve security communication and incident handling readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance website performance optimization to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Maximus
Description
Maximus is a company that partners with government agencies to provide technology infrastructure, human-centered operations support, and advanced analytics to improve public services. They serve federal, state, and local governments, as well as specialized markets, focusing on customer experience, technology services, health services, and program services.
Key services
Customer Experience, Technology Services, Health Services, Program Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager, Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg, OneTrust Consent Management, Amazon Registrar (domain registrar)
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), Adobe Helix RUM
Platforms
AWS (implied by DNS and registrar)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of security status domain locks in WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Crazy Egg, OneTrust
Marketing tools
Crazy Egg, OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on government and public sector services.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and Adobe Experience Manager CMS.
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
  6. Good security posture with HTTPS and domain locks.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via forms.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter (X), and YouTube.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Adobe Experience Manager CMS, hosted on AWS, with integration of Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg for analytics, and OneTrust for consent management. The site uses Bootstrap for responsive design and includes multimedia content such as videos and images optimized for lazy loading. The technical implementation is modern and follows best practices for accessibility and SEO. Performance is moderate, suggesting potential for further optimization. The domain is registered with Amazon Registrar, Inc. with domain locks enabled, indicating good domain security management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maximus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maximus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.