Skip to main content

Security report for maximumprotectionservices.com

Maximum Protection Services Ltd · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maximum Protection Services Ltd is a UK-based security service provider with over 40 years of experience delivering intelligent, innovative, and cost-effective security solutions. The company holds prestigious NSI Gold accreditation and operates an in-house alarm receiving center compliant with BS8418 and BS5979 standards. Their key services include CCTV systems, intruder alarms, access control, fire alarms, rapid deployment, canine services, remote monitoring, and automated gates and barriers. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting businesses requiring comprehensive security solutions. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized with moderate performance and basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is good with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though DNSSEC is not enabled and advanced security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service, though a cookie consent banner is present. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by publishing security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. The website content is safe for general audiences and professionally presented.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 15 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maximumprotectionservices.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted security solutions provider with a strong emphasis on quality and compliance, evidenced by NSI Gold accreditation. Their business model focuses on providing end-to-end security services including design, installation, and monitoring. The target market includes commercial and industrial clients requiring robust security infrastructure. The company leverages certifications and technical expertise as competitive advantages. The website's integration with social media platforms and professional branding supports customer engagement and trust. Growth indicators include a detailed services portfolio and active job listings, suggesting operational scale and expansion. Partnerships with certification bodies like NSI enhance credibility. The absence of detailed financial or parent company information suggests a standalone medium-sized enterprise. The company maintains a direct communication channel via email and contact forms, facilitating client interaction.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and HSTS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications and protection against protocol downgrade attacks. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms mitigates automated abuse. However, the lack of DNSSEC exposes the domain to potential DNS spoofing risks. No advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP) or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which could improve protection against cross-site scripting and MIME sniffing attacks. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analyzed content. The security score is moderate, reflecting good baseline practices but room for enhancement. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing CSP headers, and publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to strengthen security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) and other advanced security headers to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Maximum Protection Services Ltd
Description
Maximum Protection Services Ltd provides global intelligent, innovative, and cost-effective security solutions including design, installation, service, and monitoring of security systems. They operate an in-house NSI Gold Category 2 Alarm Receiving Centre and offer 24/7 technical support.
Key services
CCTV Systems, Intruder Alarms, Access Control Systems, Fire Alarms & Thermal Detection, Rapid Deployment, Canine Services, Remote Monitoring, Automated Gates and Barriers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Fonts (Poppins), Google reCAPTCHA, Plyr video player
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Squarespace CMS with modern design.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie banner present with opt-in consent mechanism.
  4. Contact information is limited to email and contact form; no phone or physical address explicitly found in provided content.
  5. Strong trust signals from NSI Gold accreditation and certifications.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No explicit data protection officer contact found.
  8. Website content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, leveraging its CMS and hosting infrastructure. It uses modern web fonts and includes Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. The site loads a Plyr video player for media content. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. The site is mobile responsive and has basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data present. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The absence of DNSSEC and advanced security headers represents a technical risk. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a medium-sized business website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and improved privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maximumprotectionservices.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maximumprotectionservices.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.