Skip to main content

Security report for maturexxxtop.cc

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website maturexxxtop.cc operates as an adult content aggregator specializing in mature-themed pornographic videos. It offers a wide range of categorized adult video content and links to numerous partner adult sites. The business model appears to be referral and content aggregation within the adult entertainment niche, targeting adults-only audiences. The site lacks clear business identity, contact information, and formal policies, which impacts its credibility and compliance posture. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and jQuery. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and provides basic navigation and search functionality. However, it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. The presence of intrusive pop-up scripts on page unload may degrade user experience and raise security concerns. From a security perspective, the site does not implement common security headers and lacks visible security or privacy policies. The domain uses WHOIS privacy protection, which is common in adult content sites but reduces transparency. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site is fully accessible. Advertising is integrated via an external ad network domain. Overall, the security posture is basic with room for significant improvement. The overall risk assessment indicates moderate risk due to lack of transparency, absence of privacy and cookie policies, and intrusive scripts. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, improving user experience by removing intrusive pop-ups, and providing clear business contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maturexxxtop.cc

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site positions itself as a niche adult entertainment aggregator focusing on mature content. Its competitive advantage lies in extensive categorization and a large network of partner sites, which may drive referral traffic and advertising revenue. The business model is likely based on affiliate marketing and advertising partnerships. The target customer segment is adults seeking mature pornographic content. Growth indicators are not visible due to lack of business transparency. The partnership ecosystem is extensive with many related adult domains listed as friends or partners. Strategic observations suggest the site operates as a content hub rather than a direct content producer, relying on external sites for video hosting and monetization.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include absence of security headers, lack of privacy and cookie policies, and intrusive JavaScript that triggers pop-ups on page unload. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance or incident response readiness. Data protection practices are minimal, with no visible contact channels for security incidents. The use of WHOIS privacy protection is typical but reduces trust. The business impact of these vulnerabilities includes potential user distrust, regulatory non-compliance, and increased risk of user experience degradation. Security culture indicators are not evident from the site content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Remove or modify intrusive pop-up scripts to improve user experience and reduce security risks.
  4. Provide clear and accessible business contact information including security incident contacts.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website offering a large collection of mature adult videos categorized by various adult content genres.
Key services
Adult video categorization, Referral to partner adult sites, Search functionality for adult videos
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Uses HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
trusttraff.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator with extensive categories and partner sites.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. Site uses JavaScript to open pop-ups on page unload which may be intrusive.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  6. Advertising is present via external domain trusttraff.com.
  7. No analytics or tracking services explicitly detected.
  8. Content is clearly adult and NSFW with explicit keywords and categories.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack with HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and jQuery. It lacks modern frameworks or CMS detection. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. The site structure is straightforward with categorized content and search functionality. Technical debt includes absence of security headers and outdated JavaScript practices (e.g., pop-up on unload). There are opportunities to modernize the tech stack, improve accessibility, and enhance SEO. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed, limiting deeper technical risk assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maturexxxtop.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maturexxxtop.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.