Skip to main content

Security report for mattrutherford.co.uk

Matt Rutherford · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Matt Rutherford operates a personal brand website focused on sharing weekly insights and tips related to career growth, personal development, and clarity in work and life. The site offers a newsletter subscription, blog articles, and various tools and resources aimed at individuals seeking to improve their professional and personal lives. The business model centers on content publishing and coaching services, positioning Matt Rutherford as a thought leader in this niche. The website is professionally designed, well-branded, and consistently updated with relevant content, targeting a general audience interested in self-improvement and career success. Technically, the website is built on the Ghost CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5. It integrates third-party services such as Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused tracking and Ghostboard for engagement metrics. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, although some security headers are missing. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances search engine understanding and visibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms for newsletter subscription. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, security.txt files, and incident response contact information, which are important for compliance and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The WHOIS lookup for the domain failed due to a naming rules error, which is unusual but the site is live and functional, indicating legitimacy despite the lack of WHOIS transparency. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong content quality and business credibility but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mattrutherford.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Matt Rutherford's website targets individuals focused on career advancement and personal growth, leveraging a content-driven business model with newsletters and coaching. The site maintains a strong personal brand with consistent messaging and active engagement through social media channels like LinkedIn and Instagram. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The use of Ghost CMS and privacy-conscious analytics tools indicates a modern digital infrastructure. The lack of WHOIS data transparency is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the site's credibility. The business appears to be a small-scale, independent operation with a focus on thought leadership and community building rather than large-scale commercial enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure data collection via forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against certain web attacks. The lack of published privacy and cookie policies, as well as no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, indicates gaps in compliance and security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found. The site would benefit from implementing comprehensive security headers, formal privacy documentation, and a vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance its security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Matt Rutherford
Description
Weekly tips for us all to be successful.
Key services
Weekly newsletter, Blog articles, Career coaching, Tools and resources for personal development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Ghost CMS, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Plausible Analytics, tocbot, Ghost Portal, Sodo Search
Frameworks
Ghost
Platforms
Ghost CMS platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure subscription form with email input
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Ghostboard
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ghostboard
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact available only via contact form, no direct emails or phone numbers found
  4. Strong personal branding and consistent design
  5. Use of modern CMS (Ghost) and analytics tools
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No WHOIS data available due to domain registration error message
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Ghost CMS platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies and third-party services such as Plausible Analytics and Ghostboard for performance and engagement tracking. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML, responsive design, and SEO-friendly metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is optimized with preloading of critical assets and deferred script loading. Accessibility is addressed with appropriate ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and some security best practices such as security headers are missing. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and modern, supporting a high-quality user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mattrutherford.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mattrutherford.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.