Skip to main content

Security report for matteovenet.org

Matteo Venet · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website matteovenet.org is a personal portfolio site for an individual named Matteo Venet, primarily showcasing visual projects or artworks. The site is built on WordPress and uses standard web technologies such as JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with HTTPS enabled and a moderate performance profile. However, the site lacks key compliance and security features such as privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and contact information. No analytics or tracking tools are present, indicating minimal user data collection. The domain registration is consistent with the website content and shows no suspicious patterns, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is suitable for general audiences with safe content but would benefit from improved security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching matteovenet.org

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site appears to be a personal or artistic portfolio without commercial business operations or services. There is no evidence of revenue streams, partnerships, or market positioning. The business model is unclear, and no contact or corporate information is provided. The domain age and registration status are consistent with a small-scale personal site. The lack of business certifications or trust indicators limits the business credibility assessment.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection active. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface, but the lack of security best practices such as CSP or X-Frame-Options headers could expose the site to certain risks. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve compliance with data protection regulations.
  4. Provide contact information or a contact form to improve user trust and communication.
  5. Consider adding security incident response information or a security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Matteo Venet
Description
The website appears to be a personal or portfolio site for an individual named Matteo Venet, showcasing visual projects or artworks with large images. No explicit business description or commercial services are provided.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the site.
  3. No social media links or business certifications present.
  4. Website is a simple portfolio site with minimal textual content.
  5. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. HTTPS is enabled and functioning.
  8. No DNSSEC configured for the domain.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with custom theme assets and JavaScript for image slideshows and swipe interactions. The site loads multiple JavaScript files from its own domain and uses emoji support scripts from s.w.org. The HTML is valid and includes responsive meta tags for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with large images but no heavy external dependencies. Accessibility and SEO are basic with minimal metadata and no structured data or Open Graph tags. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal technical tracking. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified but name servers suggest a hosting provider related to webreus.net.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with matteovenet.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review matteovenet.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.