Skip to main content

Security report for mattacreates.org

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website is a Google Consent Management page designed to handle user privacy preferences and consent related to Google services, specifically for users accessing Google News from Germany. It is part of Google's extensive ecosystem, reflecting their commitment to GDPR compliance and user data protection. The page is professionally designed with excellent user experience and mobile optimization, consistent with Google's branding and technical standards. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies and Google Cloud hosting, ensuring fast performance and robust security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and GDPR adherence. Overall, the domain is legitimate, trustworthy, and part of a globally recognized enterprise with a strong market position in technology and digital advertising.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mattacreates.org

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google LLC operates as a global leader in internet search, digital advertising, and cloud services. This consent page supports their business model by managing user data privacy and consent, which is critical for regulatory compliance and maintaining user trust. The target audience includes general internet users, particularly in regulated regions like the EU. Google's business model relies on advertising revenue, supported by extensive data collection and analytics, balanced by transparent privacy controls. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem and parent company Alphabet Inc. The website reflects Google's strategic focus on compliance, user control, and transparency, which are competitive advantages in the evolving regulatory landscape.

Security posture

Google's security maturity is high, demonstrated by enforced HTTPS, advanced security headers, and secure handling of user consent data. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site implements best practices for privacy and security, including content security policies and secure data transmission. However, no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages were found on this specific subdomain, which is typical for such service pages. Overall, the security posture supports Google's reputation and regulatory compliance requirements, with recommendations to maintain continuous monitoring and update security frameworks as needed.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain continuous security audits and vulnerability assessments to ensure ongoing protection.
  2. Enhance visibility and accessibility of incident response and vulnerability disclosure information for transparency.
  3. Regularly update and patch all web libraries and dependencies to mitigate emerging threats.
  4. Strengthen user education on privacy controls and consent options to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Develop a long-term strategy for integrating emerging privacy regulations and technologies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google Consent page for managing user privacy and consent preferences related to Google services such as Google News.
Key services
Consent management, Privacy controls, User data preferences
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, XMLHttpRequest, Google APIs, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Material Design Components
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy
  • Secure cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Marketing Platform
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Google consent management interface for user privacy preferences.
  2. Content is fully accessible and not blocked by any WAF or security challenge.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on this page.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity.
  6. High-quality design and user experience consistent with Google branding.
  7. Extensive use of Google-owned domains and services.
  8. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, which is expected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript, XMLHttpRequest, and Material Design Components, hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure. Performance is fast with optimized mobile responsiveness and good accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags and canonical links. The site uses multiple Google-owned domains for resources and APIs, ensuring reliability and integration. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom-built platform. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous modernization and monitoring are advised to maintain high standards and adapt to evolving web technologies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mattacreates.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mattacreates.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.