Skip to main content

Security report for materialdesignicons.com

Pictogrammers · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pictogrammers operates a specialized icon library website focused on Material Design Icons, offering a comprehensive collection of over 7200 unique icons. The site targets developers and designers seeking high-quality icons consistent with Google's Material Design guidelines. The business appears to be a small, technology-focused entity founded around 2020, maintaining a consistent brand and active social media presence. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and Material UI, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and optimized for performance and mobile devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, though improvements could be made by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner but no visible privacy or terms policies on the analyzed page. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, though it lacks explicit contact and security policy information.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of materialdesignicons.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching materialdesignicons.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a strong market position as the largest Material Design icon library, serving a niche audience of developers and designers. Its business model revolves around providing open access to icon assets and related tools, likely supported by community contributions and possibly donations or sponsorships. The presence of active versioning and changelogs indicates ongoing maintenance and growth. Social media links to GitHub and other platforms suggest an open-source or community-driven approach. The lack of explicit business contact details and formal policies may limit enterprise adoption but suits the target audience well.

Security posture

The site demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer lock in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates room for enhancement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could be a gap for security-conscious users. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the site's purpose but could be improved to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security contact information.
  5. Enhance contact information availability to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pictogrammers
Description
The original Material Design Icons library following Google's Material Design guidelines, offering over 7200 unique icons.
Key services
Icon library, Icon fonts, Icon tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Material UI, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Next.js, Material UI
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a large icon library with over 7200 icons.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the analyzed page.
  3. Cookie consent banner present with consent mechanism.
  4. Social media presence on GitHub, Mastodon, Facebook, LinkedIn.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the page.
  6. Modern web technologies used with good performance and mobile optimization.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. WHOIS data is public and consistent with the business.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based stack with Next.js and Material UI, ensuring good performance and responsive design. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure provides reliability. The site includes SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks and fonts efficiently. Accessibility and mobile optimization are well addressed. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and DNSSEC would strengthen the infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium35 findingsView report
  2. 53/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with materialdesignicons.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review materialdesignicons.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.