Skip to main content

Security report for masodikkerulet.hu

Budapest Főváros II. Kerület Önkormányzata · Government · Hungary

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Budapest Főváros II. Kerület Önkormányzata operates as the official local government authority for the 2nd district of Budapest, Hungary. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for residents and stakeholders, providing news, public service information, community engagement opportunities, and administrative contacts. The site is well-branded, consistent, and targets local citizens with relevant municipal content. Technically, the site is built on Drupal CMS with modern frontend frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, supplemented by Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for analytics and social media integration. The website is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices in place. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism are missing, representing areas for improvement. The domain is longstanding and registered consistently with the official municipal entity, enhancing trust and legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for a government entity, though it could benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching masodikkerulet.hu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website reflects a stable government entity with a clear mandate to serve the local community of Budapest's 2nd district. Its business model is public sector service provision, focusing on transparency, communication, and community support. The presence of official contact details, event announcements, and public notices indicates active engagement with residents. The site leverages partnerships with social media platforms and analytics providers to extend reach and monitor usage. There is no indication of commercial activities or subsidiaries. The domain age and registration data support a credible and established presence. Growth indicators include ongoing updates and community programs. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media and analytics services, typical for government websites.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communication. While no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, the site avoids exposing sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The use of third-party scripts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness communication. No cookie consent banner was found, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance regarding user tracking and cookies.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights related to analytics and tracking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Budapest Főváros II. Kerületi Önkormányzat
Registration number
KRID azonosító: 731126931
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Budapest Főváros II. Kerület Önkormányzata
Description
Budapest Főváros II. Kerület Önkormányzata official website providing local government information, news, services, and community updates for the 2nd district of Budapest.
Key services
Local government news and announcements, Public service information, Community engagement, Event notifications, Contact and administrative services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.1.3, Drupal CMS, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Masonry, Magnific Popup, Custom Drupal modules
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with anonymized tracking
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official local government website for Budapest II. Kerület
  2. Content is in Hungarian language
  3. No signs of phishing or malware
  4. No cookie consent banner detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap
  5. Use of multiple third-party scripts for analytics and UI enhancements
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with official emails and phone numbers
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging Bootstrap 4.1.3 and jQuery 3.2.1 for frontend responsiveness and interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics for user behavior tracking and Facebook SDK for social media features. The site uses various Drupal modules for content management and UI enhancements, including masonry layouts and popup galleries. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS files loaded, but no critical blocking issues detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, including an accessibility switch and responsive design. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but likely government or self-hosted. Technical debt appears low, though modernization opportunities exist in updating libraries and improving security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with masodikkerulet.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review masodikkerulet.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.