Skip to main content

Security report for martinutikal.com

Martin Utíkal · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Martin Utíkal is a Prague-based graphic designer with an architectural background, offering creative and art direction services primarily to cultural institutions, businesses, and individuals. The website showcases a professional portfolio with selected clients including universities and design studios, positioning the business as a niche creative service provider. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with a modern theme and includes common JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and presents content clearly with good design quality. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content itself appears trustworthy and professional. Overall, the site is functional and credible but would benefit from improved privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching martinutikal.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the creative design sector, targeting cultural and business clients in Prague and possibly broader Czech Republic. The business model is service-based, focusing on bespoke graphic design and creative direction. The website demonstrates a strong portfolio and client list, indicating established market presence in a specialized niche. Partnerships with web developers and photographers are noted, enhancing service delivery. The lack of detailed company registration or legal information on the site limits full business intelligence. Growth potential appears steady given the professional presentation and client base.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries without obvious vulnerabilities. However, it lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent mechanisms, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with better policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update all software components and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Martin Utíkal
Description
Martin Utíkal is a graphic designer with an architectural background based in Prague. He offers creative and art direction services to cultural institutions, businesses, and individuals. His work includes designing books, exhibitions, publications, identities, and websites, focusing on asserting the identity and uniqueness of his clients through clear and precise design choices.
Key services
Graphic design, Creative direction, Visual identity, Website design, Publication design
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Underscore.js 1.13.4, Backbone.js 1.5.0, Backbone.Radio, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Lay Theme 7.2.1
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented with a clear focus on graphic design services.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection not disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.1 using the Lay Theme 7.2.1, leveraging jQuery, Underscore.js, Backbone.js, and Backbone.Radio for frontend functionality. Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js for user tracking. The site uses responsive images and CSS media queries for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, representing areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with martinutikal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review martinutikal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.