Skip to main content

Security report for martinozanetti.com

FIELD ART SRL · Other · Italy

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Martino Zanetti's website serves as a professional portfolio for the artist, showcasing watercolor artworks and providing information about exhibitions and events. The business operates under FIELD ART SRL, located in Italy, targeting art enthusiasts and collectors. The website is well-structured, visually appealing, and uses modern WordPress technologies including Elementor and JetEngine, indicating a mature digital presence. Privacy compliance is robust with a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy managed via Iubenda, including a consent mechanism. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some improvements such as security headers and incident response contacts are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional content and presentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 23 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching martinozanetti.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention martinozanetti.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for martinozanetti.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a niche artist portfolio with a focus on watercolor art. Revenue likely derives from art sales and exhibitions. The website supports brand building and audience engagement through social media integration, primarily Instagram. The company is small-sized and operates in the art sector, with FIELD ART SRL as the legal entity. The website's content and structure support a clear business model centered on showcasing and selling art, with a target audience of art lovers and collectors. The use of professional tools and privacy compliance solutions indicates an awareness of digital marketing and regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting good baseline security and privacy practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a security.txt file or incident response contact information indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security score is moderate to good, but enhancing headers and incident response readiness would strengthen the security posture and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerability risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusiveness and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FIELD ART SRL
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FIELD ART SRL
Description
Noi viviamo e percorriamo il colore. Il colore percorre la nostra via
Key services
Art exhibition information, Artworks showcase, Artist biography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, JetEngine, PowerPack Elements, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda Cookie Solution, WP Rocket
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional artist portfolio in Italian language
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and JetEngine plugins
  3. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy via Iubenda
  4. No contact phone number found, only email and physical address
  5. No visible security.txt or incident response info
  6. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear
  7. No signs of adult or malicious content
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and JetEngine plugin for dynamic content. It uses PowerPack Elements and WP Rocket for performance optimization. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. The site loads quickly and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well maintained, supporting a positive user experience and digital marketing efforts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with martinozanetti.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review martinozanetti.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.