Skip to main content

Security report for marketlinc.com

MarketLinc · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MarketLinc is a technology-driven company specializing in outsourced live chat sales agents and turnkey chat solutions, leveraging over 15 years of experience and proprietary AI technology (Lift AI) to boost website revenue for its clients. The company positions itself as a leader in conversational commerce, offering pay-for-performance models and serving notable clients such as Norton, Kaspersky, and ESET. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in relevant content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, SalesLoft, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good performance and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks visible HTTP security headers and public security policies. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. However, the website's content quality, client testimonials, and branding consistency support its legitimacy. No WAF or content blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content analysis. Overall, MarketLinc presents a credible and professional business offering advanced live chat sales solutions, but should improve domain registration transparency and publish security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching marketlinc.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MarketLinc operates in the technology sector, focusing on outsourced live chat sales and AI-powered visitor prioritization. Its competitive advantage lies in its proprietary Lift AI technology and a pay-for-performance business model, appealing to businesses aiming to increase online sales conversion. The company targets medium to large enterprises with e-commerce or online sales channels. The presence of high-profile clients and testimonials indicates strong market positioning. The website's integration with multiple marketing and analytics platforms suggests a sophisticated digital marketing strategy. However, the lack of WHOIS transparency and public security documentation may pose risks in highly regulated markets.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, indicating a good baseline for privacy and security. However, the absence of detected HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No public security policies or incident response contacts are available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts is extensive but managed with user consent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy publication and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Clarify domain registration details or use verified WHOIS information to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MarketLinc
Description
Hire your team of outsourced live chat agents with over 15 years of experience, supported by powerful AI technology and a range of other turnkey chat services.
Key services
Live sales chat agents, Sales Chat-as-a-Service, Turnkey chat solutions, AI-powered visitor prioritization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Lift AI proprietary scripts, OneTrust cookie consent, SalesLoft tracking, jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, SalesLoft, LFEEDER, ProcessStats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
SalesLoft, LFEEDER, ProcessStats
Marketing tools
SalesLoft, OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong branding with notable client logos and testimonials
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  6. Uses modern web technologies and tracking tools
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and third-party integrations for analytics, marketing, and AI-powered chat services. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses Google Tag Manager, SalesLoft, and proprietary Lift AI scripts for visitor engagement and tracking. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Hosting appears to be via Webflow's infrastructure. Technical debt is minimal, but the absence of HTTP security headers and public security documentation represents a technical risk. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business model effectively but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with marketlinc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review marketlinc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.