Skip to main content

Security report for mariuspedersen.sk

Marius Pedersen · Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Network security.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Marius Pedersen is a Slovakian waste management service provider with a professional online presence focused on environmental and waste disposal services. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including SEO and anti-spam plugins, and it implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. However, explicit privacy and terms of service policies are not found in the provided content, which is a gap in compliance. The technical infrastructure is moderate in performance and mobile optimization, with SSL properly configured but lacking security headers. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional headers and explicit policies. The website is trustworthy and professional, targeting businesses and municipalities in Slovakia. No adult or questionable content is present, and no WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with content accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mariuspedersen.sk

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
95
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the waste management sector, serving a regional market in Slovakia. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on waste collection and environmental services. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, indicating a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position. The use of cookie consent and anti-spam tools suggests awareness of regulatory compliance and user experience. External links are primarily to trusted service providers and analytics platforms, with no suspicious domains detected. The absence of explicit contact information in the HTML limits direct customer engagement insights but does not detract from overall credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses anti-spam plugins to protect forms, which is positive. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The cookie consent mechanism provides granular user control, supporting GDPR compliance, though the absence of a detailed privacy policy page is a compliance gap. Incident response and security policy information are not found, indicating room for improvement in transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Include clear and verified contact information such as company emails and phone numbers on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing an incident response policy or contact channel for security issues to improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Marius Pedersen
Description
Provider of waste management services in Slovakia.
Key services
Waste collection, Waste disposal, Environmental services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Slider Revolution, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, WPBakery Page Builder, UberMenu, Ultimate VC Addons, FontAwesome
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Anti-spam plugin active

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CleanTalk pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and spam protection.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Website content is professional and focused on waste management services in Slovakia.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML source; SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
  7. No signs of malware or phishing detected.
  8. External links mostly to trusted domains such as Google, Cookiebot, and CleanTalk.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a variety of popular plugins for SEO, spam protection, and page building. The tech stack includes jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the HTML. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but the absence of security headers is a notable technical gap.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mariuspedersen.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mariuspedersen.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.