Skip to main content

Security report for maria-bejanovska.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.maria-bejanovska.com is a Japanese-language content site focused on providing detailed advice, product rankings, and lifestyle tips related to meal replacement dieting (置き換えダイエット). It targets individuals interested in weight loss and healthy living, leveraging affiliate marketing to monetize through diet product recommendations. The site content is well-structured and relevant, with moderate design quality and basic mobile optimization. Technically, the site uses standard HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. It includes third-party tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro and affiliate links to external domains. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information, and the site uses the Shift_JIS character encoding, which is less common and may impact accessibility and SEO. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. The WHOIS lookup failed to retrieve domain registration details, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. No contact information or security incident response details are provided, limiting trust and compliance posture. Overall, while the site offers valuable content and a clear business model based on affiliate marketing, the lack of domain registration data, privacy policies, and contact information presents risks. Strategic improvements in security, compliance, and transparency are recommended to enhance trustworthiness and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maria-bejanovska.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the niche diet and health advice market, focusing on meal replacement dieting strategies and product recommendations. Its business model centers on affiliate marketing, linking to diet products primarily through the affiliate-b.com network. The target audience is Japanese-speaking consumers seeking weight loss solutions. The site appears to be a small-scale operation without clear corporate backing or public business registration data. The lack of contact details and privacy policies suggests a low maturity level in business operations. The extensive use of external affiliate domains indicates reliance on third-party partnerships for revenue. Growth potential depends on improving trust signals and compliance to attract a broader audience and potential advertisers.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations like GDPR. The WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Tracking scripts are present but without clear user consent mechanisms. No incident response or security contact information is provided. These factors collectively expose the site to reputational and regulatory risks. Immediate actions should include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and clarifying domain registration details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and user consent mechanisms.
  4. Provide clear contact information including a business email and phone number to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides detailed information, advice, and product recommendations related to '置き換えダイエット' (meal replacement diet) focusing on strategies, popular products, and lifestyle tips for successful dieting.
Key services
Diet advice articles, Product rankings, Affiliate marketing for diet products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, JSON-LD, Research Artisan Pro tracking script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Research Artisan Pro tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided.
  4. Site uses affiliate marketing with external affiliate domains.
  5. Tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro are present indicating user behavior tracking.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, raising legitimacy concerns.
  7. Content is in Japanese and focused on diet and health advice.
  8. No security headers or advanced security measures detected in the provided data.
  9. No CMS or hosting provider information detected.
  10. Site uses Shift_JIS charset which is uncommon and may affect SEO and accessibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with JSON-LD structured data for SEO enhancement. It uses a third-party tracking service (Research Artisan Pro) and affiliate marketing links. The site does not appear to use a common CMS, suggesting a custom or static site. The use of Shift_JIS charset is unusual and may affect SEO and accessibility negatively. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security configurations. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security and compliance features to reduce technical debt and risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maria-bejanovska.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maria-bejanovska.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.