Skip to main content

Security report for margupasaule.lv

Margu pasaule · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Margu pasaule is a Latvian-based company specializing in the manufacturing and sale of railing systems and related construction components. Their website offers a comprehensive catalog of products including stainless steel, aluminum, and wooden railing parts, glass holders, accessories, and bicycle racks. The business targets construction professionals and retail customers within Latvia and potentially neighboring regions. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and product categorization, supporting an e-commerce business model. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, and Google Fonts, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and CSRF tokens implemented, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site is accessible and safe, with no adult or questionable content detected. However, the lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching margupasaule.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on railing and construction hardware products. Their market position appears niche and regional, serving construction companies, architects, and retail customers. The business model combines product catalog presentation with e-commerce capabilities, facilitating both B2B and B2C sales. The website's structured navigation and detailed product categories indicate a well-organized product offering. No explicit information on company size, founding year, or parent/subsidiary relationships was found. The absence of contact emails and phone numbers on the main page may limit direct customer engagement but could be present on other pages. The company demonstrates basic digital marketing integration with Google reCAPTCHA and cookie consent mechanisms.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens, which are positive security indicators. Google reCAPTCHA integration helps mitigate automated abuse. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts were found, suggesting limited transparency in security incident management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and improved compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Include clear contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and customer support.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security posture.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Margu pasaule
Description
Margu pasaule is a Latvian company specializing in manufacturing and selling railing systems and related components, including stainless steel, aluminum, and wooden railing parts, glass holders, accessories, and other construction hardware.
Key services
Manufacturing and sale of railing projects, Supply of railing kits and components, Provision of aluminum and stainless steel profiles, Sales of accessories and hardware for railings, Offering of bicycle racks and safety tapes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Google reCAPTCHA integrated on site

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich product catalog and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML snippet
  6. Use of HTTPS and CSRF tokens indicates basic security awareness
  7. No obvious security headers detected in provided data
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Google reCAPTCHA
  9. No social media links or business contact info found in provided content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, utilizing Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. Google reCAPTCHA is used for bot protection. The site appears to be custom-developed or uses an unknown CMS, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Performance is moderate with preconnect hints to external resources, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and canonical links. The site lacks explicit security headers and detailed analytics tracking, indicating a focus on basic functionality over advanced analytics or marketing integrations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with margupasaule.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review margupasaule.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.