Skip to main content

Security report for map-one.eu

REVILAK® Kartografien Bender Verlagsgesellschaft mbH · Government · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website map-one.eu is a professionally developed digital city map platform primarily targeting German municipalities, citizens, tourists, and local businesses. It offers interactive mapping services including routing, measuring tools, and information overlays. The business is operated by REVILAK® Kartografien Bender Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, a small-sized company with a niche focus on geoinformation services. The site is well-branded, consistent, and provides clear contact and legal information, enhancing business credibility. Technically, the site leverages established JavaScript libraries such as Dojo Toolkit and Leaflet for interactive map functionality. The platform is web-based with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. While no CMS is detected, the site is structured with modular CSS and JavaScript, indicating moderate technical maturity. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from URLs), but lacks explicit security headers and advanced security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a visible cookie consent banner and a comprehensive privacy policy linked in the Impressum. However, incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response readiness, and enhanced SEO could further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of map-one.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching map-one.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the government and technology sectors, providing digital mapping and GIS solutions tailored for municipalities and local businesses. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized interactive city maps with routing and measuring tools, serving a defined target audience of citizens, tourists, and municipal clients. Revenue streams likely include licensing or service fees for map usage and customer portal access. The partnership ecosystem includes the parent publishing company and a GIS software provider, indicating a focused and collaborative business model. Growth potential exists in expanding digital services for smart city initiatives and tourism promotion.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency and readiness. No signs of vulnerable libraries or exposed credentials were found. The security posture would benefit from implementing standard HTTP security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and establishing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address, to demonstrate readiness.
  4. Regularly update and audit JavaScript libraries and dependencies to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and broaden reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
REVILAK® Kartografien Bender Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Registration number
HRB 115675
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
REVILAK® Kartografien Bender Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Description
Digitaler Stadtplan mit Informationen für Bürger, Touristen, Kommune und Gewerbe
Key services
Interactive city maps, Routing and measuring tools, Information services for citizens and tourists, Customer login portal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Dojo Toolkit 1.12.2, Leaflet.js, Proj4js, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Dojo Toolkit
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a comprehensive interactive city map service.
  2. Content is primarily in German with some English language options.
  3. No forms collecting personal data detected except search inputs.
  4. No social media links found.
  5. Contact info is clearly presented in the Impressum.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  7. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Site uses Dojo and Leaflet for interactive map features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature JavaScript framework (Dojo Toolkit 1.12.2) combined with Leaflet for mapping, indicating a solid technical foundation for interactive GIS applications. The CSS is modular and responsive, supporting mobile devices effectively. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in resource loading and caching. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates minimal user data collection, aligning with privacy best practices. Technical risks include lack of security headers and potential outdated libraries, which should be addressed to maintain operational security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 44/100High38 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with map-one.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review map-one.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.