Skip to main content

Security report for map.ma

Other · Morocco

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website map.ma is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Turnstile human verification challenge page, which blocks direct access to any business or content information. The domain is registered to ITISSALAT AL-MAGHRIB, a Moroccan telecommunications operator, with a registration date in 2012 and an active status, indicating a legitimate and established entity. However, the website itself does not expose any privacy policies, cookie policies, terms of service, contact information, or business descriptions on the landing page due to the security challenge. The technical infrastructure relies heavily on Cloudflare services for security and performance, including the Turnstile CAPTCHA and Cloudflare Insights for minimal analytics. The security posture is strong in terms of protection via Cloudflare, but the lack of accessible content limits further security and compliance evaluation. Overall, the site is low in content quality and user experience due to the blocking mechanism, resulting in a low AI score and limited ability to assess business credibility or privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching map.ma

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain is owned by a major Moroccan telecom operator, suggesting the site may serve as a portal or service related to telecommunications or mapping services in Morocco. The lack of accessible content prevents detailed analysis of market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments. The use of Cloudflare indicates a focus on security and performance, but the absence of visible business information or partner links limits insights into the company's operational ecosystem or strategic partnerships.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's Turnstile CAPTCHA as a security measure to prevent automated access, indicating a proactive security stance. However, no additional security headers or policies are visible due to the content being blocked. There are no exposed vulnerabilities or sensitive data detected, but the inability to access the site content restricts a full security assessment. No incident response contacts or security policies are published on the accessible page, which is a gap in transparency and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Reduce or optimize WAF challenge to allow legitimate users and crawlers better access to content for improved SEO and user experience.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies accessible without security challenges to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide visible contact information and business details on the landing page to enhance credibility and support.
  4. Implement security headers and disclose security policies to demonstrate compliance and security maturity.
  5. Consider a staged security approach that balances protection with accessibility to improve overall site usability and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The website is presenting a Cloudflare Turnstile human verification challenge page blocking direct access to content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare Challenge Platform, Cloudflare Insights Beacon
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare Turnstile challenge.
  2. No visible business content, policies, or contact information on the landing page.
  3. Domain WHOIS data indicates a legitimate Moroccan telecom registrar.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies detected.
  5. No forms or data collection fields visible beyond the Turnstile challenge.
  6. No social media or external business links found.
  7. Website relies on Cloudflare for security and performance.
  8. No SEO or accessibility features detected due to blocked content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, utilizing their Turnstile CAPTCHA and challenge platform, which effectively blocks direct access to content. The HTML is minimal and focused on the challenge interface, with no CMS or frameworks detected. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to the blocking. The site uses Cloudflare Insights for analytics, indicating some level of traffic monitoring. The technical stack is modern in terms of security infrastructure but lacks visible content or SEO optimization. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated technologies, but the blocking mechanism severely limits user access and content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with map.ma. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review map.ma.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.