Skip to main content

Security report for manufacturingmanagement.co.uk

Mark Allen Group · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Manufacturing Management is a well-established UK-based media publication specializing in manufacturing industry news, insights, and events. It operates under the Mark Allen Group, a reputable publishing company. The website targets manufacturing professionals and industry stakeholders, offering a variety of content including news articles, in-depth features, podcasts, webinars, and a supplier network. The business model is primarily content-driven with advertising and subscription components. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Alpine.js and jQuery, integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and uses Google DFP for advertising management. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses several security best practices, though some HTTP security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is moderate with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks a visible privacy policy on the homepage. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with a moderate risk profile due to incomplete WHOIS data and minor security header gaps.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manufacturingmanagement.co.uk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention manufacturingmanagement.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for manufacturingmanagement.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website is positioned as a niche industry publication with a long history (70 years) serving the manufacturing sector in the UK. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized content, established brand, and integration within the Mark Allen Group's portfolio of engineering publications. Revenue streams likely include advertising, sponsored content, event hosting, and magazine subscriptions. The target customers are manufacturing professionals, engineers, and suppliers. The site links to partner publications and job boards, indicating a strong partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include active content updates, digital publication availability, and newsletter signups. The business operates with a medium-sized digital footprint and a consistent brand identity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. It uses asynchronous loading of scripts to improve performance and reduce attack surface. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and advertising, which should be regularly audited. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is common for media sites but could be enhanced for transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS risks.
  2. Add X-Content-Type-Options and X-Frame-Options headers to improve protection against MIME sniffing and clickjacking.
  3. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide visible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising tags for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mark Allen Group
Description
Manufacturing Management delivers trusted manufacturing news and insights with a 70-year history, targeting professionals in the manufacturing sector.
Key services
Manufacturing news, Industry insights, Events and webinars, Magazine publication, Supplier network
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Alpine.js 3.x, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Publisher Tags (GPT), Stripe.js, Swiper.js, LazySizes (lazy loading images)
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of secure cookies (implied)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async/defer for scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP)
Tracking pixels
Cookie Script
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or main navigation.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  4. Contact information is available via a contact form page; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries indicates up-to-date technical implementation.
  6. Advertising is managed via Google DFP with multiple ad units configured.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query on 'www.' subdomain rather than base domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and modular JavaScript stack including Alpine.js for UI interactivity and jQuery for legacy support. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for data collection and Google DFP for ad management. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preconnect optimizations. Images are lazy-loaded using LazySizes to improve performance. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a proprietary CMS, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are good but could be enhanced with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML improvements. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manufacturingmanagement.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manufacturingmanagement.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.