Skip to main content

Security report for mantu.com

Mantu · Technology · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mantu is a global consulting platform focused on providing guidance and services to businesses and entrepreneurs worldwide. With a large and diverse workforce spread across multiple continents, Mantu positions itself as a collaborative network of brands delivering transformative business solutions. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, leveraging WordPress CMS with modern tools such as Elementor and WP Rocket to optimize user experience and performance. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support significantly weaken the site's security posture. While DNS records show good email authentication practices with SPF and DMARC, the lack of security headers and modern TLS protocols exposes the site to potential risks. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy, but no cookie consent mechanism was detected. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business credibility and content quality but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mantu.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mantu operates in multiple sectors including technology, healthcare, retail, transportation, and finance, serving a global clientele with a workforce of approximately 12,000 people. Its business model centers on consulting and talent management, offering specialized practices such as leadership advocacy, digital marketing, and technology transformation. The company maintains a strong brand presence with dedicated career services and active social media engagement. The website's structured data and SEO optimizations support its market positioning as a leading international consulting group. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a preference for contact via forms or dedicated subdomains, aligning with professional service standards.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, resulting in no HTTPS encryption. Although SPF and DMARC records are properly configured to protect email integrity, the absence of critical security headers and mechanisms such as HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption indicates incomplete security hardening. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. These gaps increase the risk of data interception, man-in-the-middle attacks, and reduce user trust. Immediate remediation is recommended to implement HTTPS, enable modern TLS versions, and add security headers to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols and disable insecure legacy protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  6. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  7. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor for page building and WP Rocket for performance optimization. It employs jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive elements and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting is managed via Microsoft Azure DNS services. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with comprehensive metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 5.2 seconds and a page size near 900KB. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented. However, the lack of HTTPS and modern security configurations represents a significant technical risk. The site would benefit from modernization of its SSL/TLS setup and enhanced security controls to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mantu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mantu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.