Skip to main content

Security report for mantojums.lv

Nacionālā kultūras mantojuma pārvalde · Government · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

52/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mantojums.lv is a Latvian government-related cultural heritage information system managed by the Nacionālā kultūras mantojuma pārvalde. The platform provides a comprehensive database of cultural monuments, consultation services, and public information aimed at preserving and promoting Latvia's cultural heritage. The website targets Latvian citizens, heritage owners, and professionals interested in cultural preservation. Technically, the site is built on Angular 8.2.12 with Material Icons and Google Fonts, offering a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and CSP. No visible contact information or terms of service pages were found, which slightly impacts trust and compliance. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves an important public sector function.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mantojums.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
52

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a government information system supporting cultural heritage management in Latvia. It holds a strong market position as an official platform with state backing. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on public service and information dissemination. Key services include monument listings, consultations, and educational content. The target audience is broad, encompassing the general public and specialists. The site shows consistent branding and content quality, indicating a stable and credible operation. No commercial advertising or tracking is present, aligning with its public service nature. The domain registration and WHOIS data confirm legitimacy and consistency with the stated entity.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and a cookie consent mechanism is present, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of Content Security Policy and other security headers reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface, but also indicating limited interactive functionality. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are visible, which could be improved for transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Recommendations include implementing CSP, adding security headers, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a robust Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  2. Add essential security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Publish clear terms of service and incident response policies to enhance transparency and compliance.
  4. Include visible and verified contact information for user support and security reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update Angular framework to a more recent version for improved security and performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nacionālā kultūras mantojuma pārvalde
Description
Informācijas sistēma 'Mantojums' nodrošina kultūras mantojuma datu pārvaldību, konsultācijas un informācijas pieejamību par kultūras pieminekļiem Latvijā. Mērķis ir veicināt kultūras mantojuma saglabāšanu un sabiedrības iesaisti.
Key services
Kultūras pieminekļu saraksts, Konsultācijas, Mantojuma īpašnieku informācijas pārvaldība, Padomi un informācija sabiedrībai, Top 100 kultūras pieminekļu prezentācija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 8.2.12, Material Icons, Google Fonts, Custom CSS
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://)
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-related cultural heritage information system for Latvia.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with some English elements.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage or footer.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  8. Site uses Angular framework version 8.2.12 with Material Icons and Google Fonts.
  9. No third-party advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Angular 8.2.12 framework with Material Icons and Google Fonts, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. The CSS is custom and responsive, supporting good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no heavy third-party scripts or ads detected. No CMS is used, suggesting a custom-built solution. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but maintains a clear navigation structure and professional design. Technical debt may exist due to the older Angular version. Security headers and CSP are missing, representing technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mantojums.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mantojums.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.