Skip to main content

Security report for mantech.com

ManTech International Corporation · Government · United States

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ManTech International Corporation operates a professional and comprehensive website focused on providing advanced technology and cybersecurity solutions primarily to government, defense, and intelligence sectors. The company emphasizes digital transformation, data and AI, and intelligent engineering services. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern analytics and consent management tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly detailed. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional presentation and government focus. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of mantech.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 49 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

    • Medium

      Mixed Content Detected

      1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

      What to do: Ensure all resources (images, scripts, stylesheets) are loaded over HTTPS

Keep watching mantech.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate mantech.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
71
Registered
71
Resolving
71
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-07-14

Masked preview

  • ma••••.comMediumomission
  • ma•••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • oa•••••.comMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of mantech.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ManTech positions itself as a key government contractor specializing in cybersecurity and digital mission support. Its business model is B2G, targeting federal agencies and defense organizations. The company leverages partnerships, such as with Avature for career management, and maintains a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and professional content. The website content and navigation cater to a knowledgeable audience seeking specialized technology services. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or proxy registration, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, ManTech demonstrates a stable market position with a focus on innovation and mission-critical services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements multiple security headers, indicating a solid baseline security posture. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness perception. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Enhancing these areas would improve security maturity and stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page detailing security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security or abuse email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate risks.
  5. Increase transparency around certifications and compliance frameworks to strengthen trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ManTech International Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ManTech International Corporation
Description
ManTech is a provider of innovative technologies and solutions for defense, intelligence, and federal civilian markets, focusing on cybersecurity, digital transformation, data and AI, and intelligent engineering.
Key services
CyberSpace Superiority, Data and AI, Digital Transformation, Intelligent Engineering, Commercial Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, SearchWP plugin, OneTrust cookie consent, Boomerang performance monitoring
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Parsely, Akamai mPulse
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Parsely, Akamai mPulse
Marketing tools
Parsely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted at government and defense sectors.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via form.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring tools.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces transparency.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No adult or NSFW content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern plugins such as SearchWP for search functionality and OneTrust for cookie consent management. It uses Google Tag Manager and Parsely for analytics and content engagement tracking, along with Akamai mPulse for performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The technical stack is current and supports a professional user experience. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for further performance tuning and enhanced security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mantech.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mantech.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.