Skip to main content

Security report for manning-financial.ie

Manning Financial · Finance · Ireland

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Manning Financial is a small Irish financial advisory firm specializing in life insurance, income protection, pensions, savings, and investment services. The company operates as a multi-agency intermediary, offering comprehensive financial planning and wealth management tailored to individual client needs. Their market position is focused on providing competitive and suitable financial products from all life insurance companies in Ireland. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several addons, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and user experience. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but could be improved by adding security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the website presents a professional image but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manning-financial.ie

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets individuals in Ireland seeking financial planning and insurance products. Its competitive advantage lies in its multi-agency intermediary model, allowing access to a broad market of insurance providers. Revenue streams likely include commissions and fees from insurance and investment products. The company emphasizes personalized service and expert advice, supported by the managing director's extensive qualifications and experience. The partnership ecosystem includes agency appointments with multiple insurance companies, though specific partners are not detailed. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated, but the presence of video content and detailed service descriptions suggest active marketing efforts. The company operates in a regulated financial sector, requiring adherence to compliance standards which are not fully reflected on the website.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and forms use nonce tokens to prevent CSRF attacks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness indications. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files. The lack of CAPTCHA or anti-bot measures on forms could expose the site to spam or automated abuse. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Introduce CAPTCHA or other anti-bot protections on all forms to reduce spam and abuse.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Manning Financial
Description
Manning Financial is a multi-agency intermediary offering financial advice on all products and services from all life insurance companies in the Irish market. They provide services including life insurance, income protection, pensions, savings, and investment advice. The company emphasizes personalized financial planning and wealth management.
Key services
Life Cover, Income Protection, Pension & Savings, Investment
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Premium Addons for Elementor, MetForm, Royal Elementor Addons, Elementskit Lite, Essential Addons for Elementor
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure video embedding with controls and no download
  • Use of nonce tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on WordPress with Elementor and multiple addons.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage content.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  4. No security policy or incident response information is present.
  5. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  6. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks security headers.
  7. Content is professionally presented with good quality images and videos.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. Forms use nonce tokens but no CAPTCHA or anti-bot measures visible.
  10. No Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor page builder and multiple addons, indicating a flexible and extensible infrastructure. The use of React libraries and various JavaScript plugins supports interactive and dynamic content. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities in loading and accessibility. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design. SEO is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Technical debt appears low but could increase if plugin management is not maintained. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manning-financial.ie. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manning-financial.ie.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.