Skip to main content

Security report for manalustra.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

54/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website manalustra.lv currently serves as a security checkpoint page implemented by BitNinja, presenting a CAPTCHA challenge to visitors. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security service to mitigate automated or malicious traffic. Due to this blocking mechanism, the actual business content is inaccessible, limiting the ability to analyze the company's services, market position, or business model. The page references older CMS technologies such as Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 in meta tags, which are outdated and may pose security risks if still in use. Technically, the site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details were available in the provided data, and WHOIS information could not be retrieved due to query limits, preventing verification of domain registration details. The lack of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies further reduces the site's compliance posture. From a security perspective, the presence of the BitNinja CAPTCHA is a positive control to prevent automated abuse, but the absence of visible security headers and outdated CMS references suggest potential vulnerabilities. The site does not expose any adult or explicit content and is rated safe for general audiences. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for full analysis due to the security challenge, resulting in a low AI score and limited business insights.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manalustra.lv

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the security challenge page blocking access, no direct business information, contact details, or company identifiers are available. The meta tags indicate the use of Joomla and WordPress CMS platforms, but no active business description or services are presented. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja security services, suggesting a concern for cyber threats. Without WHOIS data or visible contact information, the business credibility and market positioning cannot be assessed. The target audience and business model remain unknown.

Security posture

The website employs BitNinja's security CAPTCHA to block automated or suspicious traffic, which is a strong security control. Google reCAPTCHA v2 is integrated to validate human visitors. However, no HTTP security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS) were detected in the provided data. The CMS versions referenced are outdated, which could expose the site to known vulnerabilities if still in use. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate due to the strong WAF presence but weakened by lack of visible security best practices and outdated technology references.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Ensure the website enforces HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and regularly update certificates.
  3. Update CMS platforms and all plugins to supported, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide visible and verified contact information to enhance business credibility and support incident response.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website is presenting a security CAPTCHA challenge page by BitNinja, blocking direct access to content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security check page by BitNinja.IO

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by a BitNinja anti-robot CAPTCHA page.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  4. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Website uses outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5) mentioned in meta tags, indicating potential security risks.
  6. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts are present indicating tracking.
  7. No visible security headers or SSL configuration details available.
  8. Content is minimal and only serves as a security gate, no business content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 as indicated in meta tags, which are significantly outdated and unsupported. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking and uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. The site is protected by BitNinja's security service, which presents a CAPTCHA challenge page blocking direct content access. No information about hosting provider or server infrastructure is available. The page is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features but lacks SEO optimization and modern technical enhancements. The overall technical implementation is moderate but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manalustra.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manalustra.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.