Skip to main content

Security report for manabebrene.lv

Government · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.manabebrene.lv serves as a community and tourism portal dedicated to Bebrene, a locality in Latvia. It provides information about local events, cultural activities, and tourism opportunities in the Sēlija region. The site targets local residents and tourists interested in exploring Bebrene and its surroundings. The business model is primarily informational and community-focused, promoting local culture and tourism. The website is small in scale, with content primarily in Latvian, and regularly updated with local news and events. Technically, the site uses a traditional web stack with jQuery 1.10.1, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK. The design is functional with basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. However, the site lacks modern security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version, which could pose security risks. Security posture is moderate but could be improved significantly by implementing HTTPS enforcement (if not already), adding security headers, updating libraries, and establishing privacy and cookie policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, which limits domain trust verification. The site does not appear to have any adult or questionable content, focusing instead on community and tourism information. Overall, the site is a useful local resource with good content quality but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trustworthiness and user safety.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manabebrene.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a local community and tourism information hub for Bebrene and the Sēlija region in Latvia. It leverages regular content updates, social media integration, and event coverage to engage its audience. The business model is informational and non-commercial, likely supported by local government or community organizations. There is no evidence of commercial transactions or monetization. The target audience includes local residents, tourists, and cultural enthusiasts. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms but no identified commercial partners or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited but steady content updates suggest active community involvement.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. It uses HTTPS (assumed from external scripts loaded via HTTPS), but no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.10.1) introduces potential vulnerabilities. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of malware or phishing. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in compliance and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS site-wide with HSTS header.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to latest secure versions.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  5. Add visible contact information for security incidents and data protection officer if applicable.
  6. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans.
  7. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility features.
  8. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  9. Enhance SEO by adding structured data and meta tags for better indexing.
  10. Consider integrating modern CMS or frameworks for better maintainability and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Iepazīsti Bebreni un tās skaistākās vietas. Uzzini par atpūtas un tūrisma iespējām Sēlijā. Seko līdzi Bebrenes notikumiem un jaunākajām fotogrāfijām.
Key services
Tourism information, Local news and events, Cultural and historical content
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.1, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, Google Fonts (Roboto Condensed), Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a community and tourism portal for Bebrene, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language and regularly updated with local events.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. No explicit security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Uses common JavaScript libraries and Google/Facebook analytics.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Contact information is available via a dedicated contact page.
  9. No visible forms collecting sensitive data on the homepage.
  10. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Draugiem.lv.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic front-end stack with jQuery 1.10.1, Owl Carousel for sliders, Fancybox for modals, Google Fonts for typography, and Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and social integration. The HTML structure is standard but somewhat dated. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or framework. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO meta tags are present but could be enhanced with JSON-LD structured data, which is absent. The site lacks modern security headers and uses older JavaScript libraries, which may pose risks. Hosting provider and backend technologies are not identifiable from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manabebrene.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manabebrene.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.