Skip to main content

Security report for mammadaba.lv

AS "Latvijas valsts meži" · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AS "Latvijas valsts meži" operates the mammadaba.lv website as a governmental platform promoting nature tourism, environmental education, and recreational activities in Latvian state forests. The site targets nature lovers, families, and tourists, providing rich content about destinations, routes, events, and educational programs. It holds a strong market position as the official Latvian state forest management entity, offering trusted and authoritative information. Technically, the website uses Joomla CMS with modern JavaScript frameworks like Vue.js and jQuery, and integrates privacy-respecting Matomo analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, providing a good user experience with multilingual support. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though security headers and incident response policies are absent. Privacy compliance is good with clear cookie consent and privacy policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with governmental standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of mammadaba.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mammadaba.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website reflects a large governmental organization focused on sustainable forest management and public engagement through digital channels. Its business model centers on public service and environmental education rather than commercial revenue. The presence of multiple partner domains related to environmental campaigns and education indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The content quality and branding consistency support a strong trust signal. The site’s multilingual support and rich media content suggest an intent to reach diverse audiences including local and international visitors. No commercial advertising or affiliate programs are detected, reinforcing its public service nature.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, CSRF token usage, and privacy-conscious analytics. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policy or incident response contact is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. The site uses multiple third-party scripts (YouTube, Vimeo) which should be regularly audited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, security is adequate but could be improved by adopting additional headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add a security.txt file to improve transparency and communication with security researchers.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS "Latvijas valsts meži"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AS "Latvijas valsts meži"
Description
AS "Latvijas valsts meži" operates a website promoting nature destinations, routes, events, and environmental education in Latvian state forests. It offers information about tourism centers, nature parks, and organizes environmental awareness campaigns.
Key services
Nature destination information, Tourism and recreation centers, Environmental education programs, Event announcements, Podcast content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, jQuery 3.5.1, Vue.js, Matomo Analytics, Perfect Scrollbar, YouTube iframe API, Vimeo Player API
Frameworks
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in scripts
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Clear governmental branding and official links.
  3. Multiple language options available.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contacts.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and CMS.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with a modern front-end stack including Vue.js and jQuery. It uses Matomo for analytics, favoring privacy over commercial trackers. The site is mobile-optimized and includes multiple interactive components such as sliders and maps. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and multiple JavaScript files. The site uses asynchronous script loading and deferred execution to improve load times. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting appears stable and likely managed by or for the Latvian state forestry organization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers to modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mammadaba.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mammadaba.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.