Skip to main content

Security report for mamc2020.org

Other · Japan

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mamc2020.org is a Japanese language content site focused on providing rankings and recommendations for facial esthetic salons in the Ikebukuro area. It targets local consumers interested in skincare and beauty treatments, primarily through informational content and affiliate marketing. The site has a basic technical infrastructure using standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with a Shift_JIS charset indicating a focus on Japanese text encoding. While the site is accessible and contains relevant content, it lacks critical business and security information such as privacy policies, contact details, and WHOIS registrant data. The absence of these elements reduces trustworthiness and compliance posture. The site includes third-party tracking scripts but does not provide cookie consent mechanisms or GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the site appears to be a small niche content platform with limited security and privacy maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mamc2020.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mamc2020.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mamc2020.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mamc2020.org operates as a niche content and affiliate marketing platform within the Japanese beauty and esthetic salon sector. Its market positioning is localized and focused on facial esthetic services in Ikebukuro. The business model relies on content-driven recommendations and possibly affiliate referrals to salons. The lack of clear company information, contact details, or certifications suggests a small-scale operation without formal business disclosures. External links to unrelated domains may indicate partnerships or affiliate relationships but are not clearly defined. Growth potential is limited by the absence of trust signals and professional business presentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security posture. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no forms or input fields were found to assess secure handling of user data. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and general data protection compliance. The presence of third-party tracking scripts without consent mechanisms further weakens privacy compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security best practices, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including company email and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  3. Configure and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS settings and add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options).
  4. Conduct a WHOIS domain registration update or privacy disclosure to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search rankings.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides information and rankings about facial esthetic salons and clinics in Ikebukuro, Japan, focusing on facial skincare treatments and recommending specific salons such as Vitule.
Key services
Facial esthetic salon rankings, Skincare advice, Affiliate links to salons
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed response, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
  5. Site uses Japanese language and targets local Japanese consumers interested in facial esthetic salons.
  6. External links point to various unrelated domains, possibly affiliate or content partners.
  7. Site includes a third-party tracking script from Research Artisan Pro.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. Site uses Shift_JIS charset, which is uncommon and may affect SEO and accessibility.
  10. No forms detected on the main page content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS with JavaScript for tracking purposes. The charset is Shift_JIS, which is less common and may affect SEO and accessibility negatively. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, indicating a simple static or lightly dynamic site. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. The site lacks modern accessibility features and SEO best practices such as meta descriptions beyond title and canonical tags. The inclusion of third-party tracking scripts suggests some level of user data collection but without visible consent mechanisms. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mamc2020.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mamc2020.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.