Skip to main content

Security report for mam.sk

MaM Multimedia s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MaM Multimedia s.r.o. is a Slovak technology service provider specializing in web design, e-commerce solutions, web hosting, and online marketing. Established in 2003, the company offers a comprehensive range of internet-related services including graphic design, IT equipment provisioning, and internet connectivity. Their market position is supported by a long domain age and references to notable projects such as the official city website of Žilina and various e-commerce clients. Technically, the website employs legacy technologies with JavaScript and Google Analytics integrations but lacks modern security and privacy features. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers, combined with no visible privacy or cookie policies, indicates compliance and security gaps. Overall, the site is functional but requires modernization and enhanced security measures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mam.sk

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses and organizations needing web and IT services. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on custom web development, hosting, and digital marketing. The presence of multiple client references and long domain registration suggests stable operations and regional market presence. However, the website's dated design and lack of modern compliance features may impact competitive positioning. The company leverages partnerships with clients visible through linked domains, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth potential exists through modernization and enhanced digital presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with DNSSEC enabled on the domain, which is a positive indicator. However, the lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and outdated charset usage present vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The use of Google Analytics without visible cookie consent mechanisms raises privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strict transport security (HSTS) to secure all communications.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Introduce cookie consent mechanisms to manage user tracking and improve privacy compliance.
  5. Modernize website charset to UTF-8 and improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MaM Multimedia s.r.o.
Description
Spoločnosť MaM Multimedia s.r.o. sa zaoberá službami súvisiacimi s internetom, multimédiami, grafikou a výpočtovou technikou. Poskytuje komplexný servis v oblastiach ako tvorba web stránok, programovanie internetových aplikácií, e-shopov, databázových a intranet aplikácií, profesionálny webhosting, tvorba multimediálnych produktových katalógov a prezentačných CD, web promotion a reklama, vybavenie klientov počítačovou technikou, pripojenie na internet a internetové poradenstvo a školenia.
Key services
web design and development, e-commerce solutions, web hosting, online marketing and Google advertising, graphic design and printing, internet connectivity services, IT consulting and training
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses legacy charset windows-1250 which is outdated.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page.
  4. Website design and navigation are basic and not mobile optimized.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates tracking but no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well established with DNSSEC enabled.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in provided data.
  8. No social media links or email contacts explicitly found.
  9. Forms present for domain registration inquiry but no sensitive data exposure detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy HTML with charset windows-1250 and JavaScript for UI interactions. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The hosting appears to be managed via speedweb.sk and speedhost.sk nameservers. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows no evidence of responsive design or accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with updated technologies and optimization. Technical debt is evident in outdated markup and missing security best practices, posing risks to user experience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mam.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mam.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.