Skip to main content

Security report for maksatnespejasprocess.lv

SIA MNP · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA MNP is a Latvian legal firm specializing in insolvency processes for both individuals and companies. The company offers a comprehensive range of legal services including free consultations, document preparation, debt recovery, and court representation. With over 10 years of experience and a high success rate, MNP positions itself as a trusted provider in the insolvency legal sector in Latvia. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information, enhancing client trust and accessibility. Technically, the site is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits limits full domain legitimacy verification, but the business information and website content appear consistent and professional. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital presence with opportunities to enhance privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maksatnespejasprocess.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MNP operates in the niche legal services market focused on insolvency and debt resolution in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized expertise, a strong track record of successful cases, and offering free initial consultations to attract clients. The business model is service-based, generating revenue from legal service fees post-consultation. The target audience includes individuals and companies facing financial difficulties. The firm maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and client trust signals such as success statistics and guarantees. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators include a sizable client base and a high percentage of successful case closures. Strategic observations suggest that enhancing privacy and security transparency could further strengthen market position and client confidence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, uses secure form inputs with validation, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the site content or scripts. The absence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism represents a compliance gap, especially under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia. Incident response and security policy information are not present, limiting the assessment of organizational security maturity. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good foundational practices but requires enhancements in headers and privacy compliance to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve web security.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and communicate incident response procedures and security policies on the website.
  5. Obtain and provide WHOIS domain registration details to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA MNP
Registration number
40203348377
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA MNP
Description
Juridiskais birojs, kas specializējas maksātnespējas procesā gan privātpersonām, gan uzņēmumiem, piedāvājot juridiskos pakalpojumus, konsultācijas un dokumentu sagatavošanu maksātnespējas jautājumos.
Key services
Privātpersonu maksātnespējas process, Juridisko personu maksātnespējas process, Tiesiskās aizsardzības process, Parādu piedziņa, Dokumentu apstrāde, Līgumu sagatavošana, Bezmaksas jurista konsultācijas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Tilda CMS, Tilda Phone Mask
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form inputs with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on legal insolvency services in Latvia.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, address, and contact form.
  5. Uses Tilda CMS platform with standard scripts and Google Analytics.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Good mobile optimization and user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing JavaScript, jQuery, and Google Analytics for tracking. It uses Tilda's CDN for hosting static assets, ensuring reliable content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features at a basic level. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of maps. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include enhancing security headers and privacy features. The technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but can be improved for better security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maksatnespejasprocess.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maksatnespejasprocess.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.